Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35930663›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Assessing suspension and infectivity times of virus-loaded aerosols involved in airborne transmission.

Tania Merhi, Omer Atasi, Clémence Coetsier, Benjamin Lalanne, Kevin Roger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Hydration gradients drive lipid self-segregation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tania MerhiLaboratoire de Génie Chimique, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, 31400 Toulouse, France.
Omer AtasiLaboratoire de Génie Chimique, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, 31400 Toulouse, France.
Clémence CoetsierLaboratoire de Génie Chimique, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, 31400 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2483-2923
Benjamin LalanneLaboratoire de Génie Chimique, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, 31400 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1074-0219
Kevin RogerLaboratoire de Génie Chimique, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, 31400 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7914-0951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Airborne transmission occurs through droplet-mediated transport of viruses following the expulsion of an aerosol by an infected host. Transmission efficiency results from the interplay between virus survival in the drying droplet and droplet suspension time in the air, controlled by the coupling between water evaporation and droplet sedimentation. Furthermore, droplets are made of a respiratory fluid and thus, display a complex composition consisting of water and nonvolatile solutes. Here, we quantify the impact of this complex composition on the different phenomena underlying transmission. Solutes lead to a nonideal thermodynamic behavior, which sets an equilibrium droplet size that is independent of relative humidity. In contrast, solutes do not significantly hinder transport due to their low initial concentration. Realistic suspension times are computed and increase with increasing relative humidity or decreasing temperature. By uncoupling drying and suspended stages, we observe that enveloped viruses may remain infectious for hours in dried droplets. However, their infectivity decreases with increasing relative humidity or temperature after dozens of minutes. Examining expelled droplet size distributions in the light of these results leads to distinguishing two aerosols. Most droplets measure between 0 and 40 µm and compose an aerosol that remains suspended for hours. Its transmission efficiency is controlled by infectivity, which decreases with increasing humidity and temperature. Larger droplets form an aerosol that only remains suspended for minutes but corresponds to a much larger volume and thus, viral load. Its transmission efficiency is controlled by droplet suspension time, which decreases with increasing humidity and decreasing temperature.

Indexed as

Respiratory Aerosols and DropletsVirus DiseasesHumansHumiditySuspensionsWaterSuspensionsWateraerosolevaporationinfectivitysalivavirus

Identifiers

PMID35930663
PMCPMC9371747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.