ReviewScience advances2022
Linking the nonmaterial dimensions of human-nature relations and human well-being through cultural ecosystem services.
Review in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Spatial distribution and influencing factors of rural cultural ecosystem services: a case study of Fujian, China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Beneficial Interaction Between Human Well-Being and Natural Healthy Ecosystems: An Integrative Narrative Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
- Article
- Space Prescription: Initiative to Improve Health and Well-being in Tokyo.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2025Review
- Article
- Dynamic evolution and spatial spillover effect of agricultural green development on eight economic regions in China.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Building towards an adolescent neural urbanome: Expanding environmental measures using linked external data (LED) in the ABCD study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Nature is resource, playground, and gift: What artificial intelligence reveals about human-Nature relationships.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Why nature matters: A systematic review of intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values.Bioscience · 2024Review
- Progress toward the sustainable development of world cultural heritage sites facing land-cover changes.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2023Article
- The impact of physical environments on outpatient mental health recovery: A design-oriented qualitative study of patient perspectives.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nature contributes substantially to human well-being through its diverse material and nonmaterial contributions. However, despite the growing literature on the nonmaterial dimensions of human-nature relations, we lack a systematic understanding of how they are linked with human well-being. Here, we use the concept of cultural ecosystem services (CESs) as a lens to explore this interface. Through a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature, we elicit the unique pathways and mechanisms linking individual CESs and constituents of human well-being, as well as their relative effects. Subsequently, we identify their complex interactions through latent class analysis and multiple correspondence analysis, which delineate five major assemblages that reflect synergies and trade-offs at the interface of CESs and human well-being. We critically discuss key research trends and gaps and propose directions for future research and practice to leverage the potential of the nonmaterial contributions of nature for human well-being and sustainability more broadly.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.