Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35930410›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of medicine2022

Gender differences in esophageal variceal bleeding in the United States.

Aalam Sohal, Hunza Chaudhry, Armaan Dhaliwal, Piyush Singla, Gagan Gupta, Raghav Sharma, Dino Dukovic, Devang Prajapati

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Aalam SohalDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California, Fresno, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8365-7240
Hunza ChaudhryDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California, Fresno, CA, USA.
Armaan DhaliwalDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona, South Campus-Tucson, AZ, USA.
Piyush SinglaDayanand Medical College and Hospital, Punjab, India.
Gagan GuptaDayanand Medical College and Hospital, Punjab, India.
Raghav SharmaPunjab Institute of Medical Sciences, Punjab, India.
Dino DukovicRoss University School of Medicine, Bridgetown, Barbados.
Devang PrajapatiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of California, Fresno, CA, USA.
California State University, Fresno · USDayanand Medical College & Hospital · INPunjab Institute of Medical Sciences · INRoss University School of Veterinary Medicine · KNUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsEsophageal variceal bleeding is a common reason for hospitalization in patients with cirrhosis. The main objective of this study was to analyze the effects of gender differences on outcomes in hospitalizations related to Esophageal variceal bleeding in the United States.

methodsA retrospective observational cohort study was performed using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for all hospitalizations with a discharge diagnosis of esophageal varices with hemorrhage from 2016 to 2019. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, while secondary outcomes included rate of early endoscopy (defined as less than 1 day), AKI, blood transfusion, sepsis, ICU admission and TIPS (Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt). We also compared the length of stay and total hospitalization charges.

resultsWe identified a total of 166,760 patients with variceal bleeding of which 32.7% were females. In-hospital mortality was higher in males, 9.91%, compared to females, 8.31% (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.88, p-value=.008, when adjusted for confounding factors). The odds of undergoing an EGD, length of stay, or total hospitalization charges did not differ between the two groups. Compared to men, women had lower odds of receiving TIPS (aOR = 0.83, p-value=.002).

conclusionWomen hospitalised with esophageal variceal bleeding are at a lower risk of death compared to males. Further research is needed to elucidate the factors associated with this lower risk.

Indexed as

Esophageal and Gastric VaricesPortasystemic Shunt, Transjugular IntrahepaticFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited StatescirrhosisdisparitiesGendervariceal bleeding

Identifiers

PMID35930410
PMCPMC9359179
OpenAlexW4289913020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.