Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35930309›Full record

ReviewRenal failure2022

Predicting renal function recovery and short-term reversibility among acute kidney injury patients in the ICU: comparison of machine learning methods and conventional regression.

Xiujuan Zhao, Yunwei Lu, Shu Li, Fuzheng Guo, Haiyan Xue, Lilei Jiang, Zhenzhou Wang, Chong Zhang, Wenfei Xie, Fengxue Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Renal failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Temporal Recurrent Neural Networks for Predicting Acute Kidney Injury Recovery by Time of Discharge.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Use of machine learning algorithms to construct models of symptom burden cluster risk in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiujuan ZhaoDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
Yunwei LuDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
Shu LiDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
Fuzheng GuoDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
Haiyan XueDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
Lilei JiangDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
Zhenzhou WangDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
Chong ZhangDepartment of Yunnan Baiyao Group Medicine Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd, Beijing, PR China.
Wenfei XieDepartment of Yunnan Baiyao Group Medicine Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd, Beijing, PR China.
Fengxue ZhuDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Trauma Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, PR China.
Peking University · CNPeking University People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most frequent complications of critical illness. We aimed to explore the predictors of renal function recovery and the short-term reversibility after AKI by comparing logistic regression with four machine learning models.

methodsWe reviewed patients who were diagnosed with AKI in the MIMIC-IV database between 2008 and 2019. Recovery from AKI within 72 h of the initiating event was typically recognized as the short-term reversal of AKI. Conventional logistic regression and four different machine algorithms (XGBoost algorithm model, Bayesian networks [BNs], random forest [RF] model, and support vector machine [SVM] model) were used to develop and validate prediction models. The performance measures were compared through the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AU-ROC), calibration curves, and 10-fold cross-validation.

resultsA total of 12,321 critically ill adult AKI patients were included in our analysis cohort. The renal function recovery rate after AKI was 67.9%. The maximum and minimum serum creatinine (SCr) within 24 h of AKI diagnosis, the minimum SCr within 24 and 12 h, and antibiotics usage duration were independently associated with renal function recovery after AKI. Among the 8364 recovered patients, the maximum SCr within 24 h of AKI diagnosis, the minimum Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, the maximum blood urea nitrogen (BUN) within 24 h, vasopressin and vancomycin usage, and the maximum lactate within 24 h were the top six predictors for short-term reversibility of AKI. The RF model presented the best performance for predicting both renal functional recovery (AU-ROC [0.8295 ± 0.01]) and early recovery (AU-ROC [0.7683 ± 0.03]) compared with the conventional logistic regression model.

conclusionsThe maximum SCr within 24 h of AKI diagnosis was a common independent predictor of renal function recovery and the short-term reversibility of AKI. The RF machine learning algorithms showed a superior ability to predict the prognosis of AKI patients in the ICU compared with the traditional regression models. These models may prove to be clinically helpful and can assist clinicians in providing timely interventions, potentially leading to improved prognoses.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryIntensive Care UnitsAdultBayes TheoremCritical IllnessHumansMachine LearningRecovery of FunctionROC CurveAcute kidney injurymachine learningrenal function recoveryrenal function recovery time

Identifiers

PMID35930309
PMCPMC9359199
OpenAlexW4289952424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.