ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2022
[
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Zirconium-89-based PSMA PET/CT with delayed imaging for early detection of biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients with PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL: A feasibility study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- PET-imaging derived prognostic factors for prostate cancer patients with visceral metastases receiving [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Preclinical Evaluation of a Radiolabeled Anti-PSMA Dimeric Aptamer in a Murine Model of Human Prostate Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Evaluation of (1Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- PSMA PET/CT in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer with PSA levels ≤ 0.2 ng/mL: a German multicenter analysis of conventional PSMA tracers, including [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Outstanding increase in tumor-to-background ratio over time allows tumor localization by [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
- Long-Term Tumor-Targeting Effect ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024Article
- From Bench to Bedside: Patient-Oriented Radiopharmaceutical Development in Nuclear Medicine Based on the Example of [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Detection efficacy of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Article
- Histologically Confirmed Testicular Metastasis Revealed by [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Detection Efficacy ofCancers · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeProstate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET/CT has become increasingly important in the management of prostate cancer, especially in localization of biochemical recurrence (BCR). PSMA-targeted PET/CT imaging with long-lived radionuclides as
methodsSeven patients with BCR of prostate cancer who revealed no (n = 4) or undetermined (n = 3) findings on [
resultsIntense physiological uptake was observed in the salivary and lacrimal glands, liver, spleen, kidneys, intestine and urinary tract. The parotid gland received the highest absorbed dose (0.601 ± 0.185 mGy/MBq), followed by the kidneys (0.517 ± 0.125 mGy/MBq). The estimated overall effective dose for the administration of 111 MBq was 10.1 mSv (0.0913 ± 0.0118 mSv/MBq). In 6 patients, and in particular in 3 of 4 patients with negative [
conclusion[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.