Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35929978›Full record

ReviewGlobal change biology2022

Toward a decade of ocean science for sustainable development through acoustic animal tracking.

Josep Alós, Kim Aarestrup, David Abecasis, Pedro Afonso, Alexandre Alonso-Fernandez, Eneko Aspillaga, Margarida Barcelo-Serra, Jonathan Bolland, Miguel Cabanellas-Reboredo, Robert Lennox and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global change biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Josep AlósInstituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados, IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), Esporles, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4385-9539
Kim AarestrupSection for Freshwater Fisheries and Ecology, National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Technical University of Denmark, Silkeborg, Denmark.
David AbecasisCenter of Marine Sciences, Universidade do Algarve (CCMAR), Faro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9802-8153
Pedro AfonsoInstitute of Marine Research (IMAR/Okeanos), University of the Azores, Horta, Portugal.
Alexandre Alonso-FernandezInstituto de Investigaciones Marinas (IIM), CSIC, Vigo, Spain.
Eneko AspillagaInstituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados, IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), Esporles, Spain.
Margarida Barcelo-SerraInstituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados, IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), Esporles, Spain.
Jonathan BollandHull International Fisheries Institute, University of Hull, Hull, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7326-5075
Miguel Cabanellas-ReboredoNational Center Spanish Institute of Oceanography, CSIC, Balearic Islands CO, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0906-1243
Robert LennoxNORCE Norwegian Research Center AS, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1010-0577
Ross McGillLoughs Agency, Derry/Londonderry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5920-9293
Aytaç ÖzgülEge University, Faculty of Fisheries, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7706-9012
Jan ReubensFlanders Marine Institute, Ostend, Belgium.
David Villegas-RíosInstituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados, IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), Esporles, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5660-5322

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ocean is a key component of the Earth's dynamics, providing a great variety of ecosystem services to humans. Yet, human activities are globally changing its structure and major components, including marine biodiversity. In this context, the United Nations has proclaimed a Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development to tackle the scientific challenges necessary for a sustainable use of the ocean by means of the Sustainable Development Goal 14 (SDG14). Here, we review how Acoustic animal Tracking, a widely distributed methodology of tracking marine biodiversity with electronic devices, can provide a roadmap for implementing the major Actions to achieve the SDG14. We show that acoustic tracking can be used to reduce and monitor the effects of marine pollution including noise, light, and plastic pollution. Acoustic tracking can be effectively used to monitor the responses of marine biodiversity to human-made infrastructures and habitat restoration, as well as to determine the effects of hypoxia, ocean warming, and acidification. Acoustic tracking has been historically used to inform fisheries management, the design of marine protected areas, and the detection of essential habitats, rendering this technique particularly attractive to achieve the sustainable fishing and spatial protection target goals of the SDG14. Finally, acoustic tracking can contribute to end illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing by providing tools to monitor marine biodiversity against poachers and promote the development of Small Islands Developing States and developing countries. To fully benefit from acoustic tracking supporting the SDG14 Targets, trans-boundary collaborative efforts through tracking networks are required to promote ocean information sharing and ocean literacy. We therefore propose acoustic tracking and tracking networks as relevant contributors to tackle the scientific challenges that are necessary for a sustainable use of the ocean promoted by the United Nations.

Indexed as

EcosystemSustainable DevelopmentAcousticsAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesFisheriesHumansOceans and Seasacoustic trackingclimate changefisheriesmarine pollutionmovementnetworksocean monitoringsustainable developmenttelemetry

Identifiers

PMID35929978
PMCPMC9541420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.