Trial reportThe British journal of surgery2022
Postoperative Packing of Perianal Abscess Cavities (PPAC2): randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in The British journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03315169 (The Impact of Postoperative Packing of Perianal Abscess Cavities), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Impact of Postoperative Packing of Perianal Abscess Cavities: a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of packing in the management of perianal abscesses.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2025Pooled it
- Lived experience of pilonidal sinus disease: Systematic review and meta-ethnography.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Pooled it
- WSES-AAST guidelines: management of inflammatory bowel disease in the emergency setting.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021Guideline
- Role of prolonged packing in postoperative anorectal abscess management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgiePooled it
- The value of honey dressings in pilonidal cyst healing: a prospective randomized single-center trial.Techniques in coloproctology · 2023Trial
- Comparison of incision and drainage procedure with drainage and ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract in the treatment of deep perianal abscess.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Treatment method selection for perianal abscesses: bedside or operating room? a single center, retrospective study.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- Targeting obesity and lipid metabolism profiles to prevent perianal abscesses: A case-control study and Mendelian randomization analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- Clinical application of the intersphincteric approach with internal incision combined with counter- drainage for deep perianal abscess.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Clinical evaluation of day surgery for anal fistula excision with MRI-assisted diagnosis: a retrospective analysis of 121 cases.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Needs Analysis of Supportive Care for Postoperative Wound Rehabilitation in Anal Fistula Patients Based on the Kano Model.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Anorectal Abscess.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024Review
- Management of subcutaneous abscesses: prospective cross-sectional study (MAGIC).The British journal of surgery · 2024Article
- Sex-based analysis of characteristics contributing to anorectal abscesses requiring acute care surgery.Surgery in practice and science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerianal abscess is common. Traditionally, postoperative perianal abscess cavities are managed with internal wound packing, a practice not supported by evidence. The aim of this randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to assess if non-packing is less painful and if it is associated with adverse outcomes.
methodsThe Postoperative Packing of Perianal Abscess Cavities (PPAC2) trial was a multicentre, RCT (two-group parallel design) of adult participants admitted to an NHS hospital for incision and drainage of a primary perianal abscess. Participants were randomized 1:1 (via an online system) to receive continued postoperative wound packing or non-packing. Blinded data were collected via symptom diaries, telephone, and clinics over 6 months. The objective was to determine whether non-packing of perianal abscess cavities is less painful than packing, without an increase in perianal fistula or abscess recurrence. The primary outcome was pain (mean maximum pain score on a 100-point visual analogue scale).
resultsBetween February 2018 and March 2020, 433 participants (mean age 42 years) were randomized across 50 sites. Two hundred and thirteen participants allocated to packing reported higher pain scores than 220 allocated to non-packing (38.2 versus 28.2, mean difference 9.9; P < 0.0001). The occurrence of fistula-in-ano was low in both groups: 32/213 (15 per cent) in the packing group and 24/220 (11 per cent) in the non-packing group (OR 0.69, 95 per cent c.i. 0.39 to 1.22; P = 0.20). The proportion of patients with abscess recurrence was also low: 13/223 (6 per cent) in the non-packing group and 7/213 (3 per cent) in the packing group (OR 1.85, 95 per cent c.i. 0.72 to 4.73; P = 0.20).
conclusionAvoiding abscess cavity packing is less painful without a negative morbidity risk. REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN93273484 (https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN93273484). REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03315169 (http://clinicaltrials.gov).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.