Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35929542›Full record

ArticleJournal of hospital medicine2022

Safety and effectiveness of apixaban versus warfarin for acute venous thromboembolism in patients with end-stage kidney disease: A national cohort study.

Michael I Ellenbogen, Shirin Ardeshirrouhanifard, Jodi B Segal, Michael B Streiff, Steven B Deitelzweig, Daniel J Brotman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hospital medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Comparative safety of oral anticoagulants in severe renal impairment.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Apixaban Use in Patients with Kidney Impairment: A Review of Pharmacokinetic, Interventional, and Observational Study Data.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael I EllenbogenDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0701-8054
Shirin ArdeshirrouhanifardDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jodi B SegalDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Michael B StreiffDepartments of Medicine and Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Steven B DeitelzweigDepartment of Medicine, Ochsner Health System, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Daniel J BrotmanDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9947-0170
Johns Hopkins University · USOchsner Health System · US

Funding

Bristol-Myers Squibb
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are at significantly increased risk for both thrombosis and bleeding relative to those with normal renal function. The optimal therapy of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with ESKD is unknown.

objectiveTo compare the safety and effectiveness of apixaban relative to warfarin in patients with ESKD and acute VTE. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsNew-user, active-comparator retrospective United States population-based cohort with inverse probability of treatment weighting, using the United States Renal Data System data from 2014 to 2018. We included adults with ESKD on hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis who were newly initiated on apixaban or warfarin for an acute VTE. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The coprimary outcomes were major bleeding, recurrent VTE, and all-cause mortality within 6 months of anticoagulant initiation. Secondary outcomes were intracranial hemorrhage and gastrointestinal bleeding. The primary analyses were based on intent-to-treat defined by the first drug received and accounted for competing risks of death. Sensitivity analyses included varied follow-up time, as-treated analyses, and dose-specific apixaban subgroups.

resultsThe apixaban and warfarin cohorts included 2302 and 9263 patients, respectively. Apixaban was associated with a lower risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-0.94), intracranial bleeding (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-0.98), and gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.96). Recurrent VTE and all-cause mortality were not significantly different between the groups.

conclusionApixaban was associated with a lower risk of bleeding relative to warfarin when used to treat acute VTE in patients with ESKD on dialysis.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicVenous ThromboembolismVenous ThrombosisAdultAnticoagulantsCohort StudiesGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansPyrazolesPyridonesRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesWarfarinAnticoagulantsapixabanPyrazolesPyridonesWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID35929542
PMCPMC9804323
OpenAlexW4289884352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.