Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35929466›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the American Heart Association2022

Repeated Measures of Modified Rankin Scale Scores to Assess Functional Recovery From Stroke: AFFINITY Study Findings.

Alexander Chye, Maree L Hackett, Graeme J Hankey, Erik Lundström, Osvaldo P Almeida, John Gommans, Martin Dennis, Stephen Jan, Gillian E Mead, Andrew H Ford and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Alexander ChyeThe George Institute for Global Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8379-371X
Maree L HackettThe George Institute for Global Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1211-9087
Graeme J HankeyMedical School Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6044-7328
Erik LundströmDepartment of Neuroscience Neurology, Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5313-9052
Osvaldo P AlmeidaMedical School University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8689-6199
John GommansHawke's Bay Hospital, Hastings Hawke's Bay New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3750-765X
Martin DennisCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh Scotland United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1148-8972
Stephen JanThe George Institute for Global Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2839-1405
Gillian E MeadUsher Institute University of Edinburgh Edinburgh Scotland United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7494-2023
Andrew H FordMedical School University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6077-7880
Christopher Etherton BeerMedical School University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5148-0188
Leon FlickerMedical School University of Western Australia Perth Western Australia Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3650-0475
Candice DelcourtThe George Institute for Global Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2257-4286
Laurent BillotThe George Institute for Global Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4975-9793
Craig S AndersonThe George Institute for Global Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7248-4863
Katharina Stibrant SunnerhagenInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology-Clinical Neuroscience The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5940-4400
Qilong YiCanadian Blood Services and University of Toronto Toronto Canada.
Severine BompointThe George Institute for Global Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Thang Huy NguyenCerebrovascular Disease Department The People's Hospital 115 Ho Chi Min City Vietnam.
Thomas LungThe George Institute for Global Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9978-6311
The University of Western Australia · AUUNSW Sydney · AUUniversity of Edinburgh · GBHawke's Bay Hospital · NZPeking University · CNThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Lancashire · GBUniversity of Toronto · CAUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Function after acute stroke using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is usually assessed at a point in time. The analytical implications of serial mRS measurements to evaluate functional recovery over time is not completely understood. We compare repeated-measures and single-measure analyses of the mRS from a randomized clinical trial. Methods and Results Serial mRS data from AFFINITY (Assessment of Fluoxetine in Stroke Recovery), a double-blind placebo randomized clinical trial of fluoxetine following stroke (n=1280) were analyzed to identify demographic and clinical associations with functional recovery (reduction in mRS) over 12 months. Associations were identified using single-measure (day 365) and repeated-measures (days 28, 90, 180, and 365) partial proportional odds logistic regression. Ninety-five percent of participants experienced a reduction in mRS after 12 months. Functional recovery was associated with age at stroke <70 years; no prestroke history of diabetes, coronary heart disease, or ischemic stroke; prestroke history of depression, a relationship partner, living with others, independence, or paid employment; no fluoxetine intervention; ischemic stroke (compared with hemorrhagic); stroke treatment in Vietnam (compared with Australia or New Zealand); longer time since current stroke; and lower baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale & Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores. Direction of associations was largely concordant between single-measure and repeated-measures models. Association strength and variance was generally smaller in the repeated-measures model compared with the single-measure model. Conclusions Repeated-measures may improve trial precision in identifying trial associations and effects. Further repeated-measures stroke analyses are required to prove methodological value. Registration URL: http://www.anzctr.org.au; Unique identifier: ACTRN12611000774921.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeStrokeFluoxetineHumansRecovery of FunctionResearch DesignTreatment OutcomeFluoxetinecerebrovascular diseasefunctional outcomesmodified Rankin Scalepartial proportional oddsrepeated measuresstroke

Identifiers

PMID35929466
PMCPMC9496315
OpenAlexW4289868909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.