Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35929067›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2022

Transcription-coupled donor DNA expression increases homologous recombination for efficient genome editing.

Kaixuan Gao, Xuedi Zhang, Zhenwu Zhang, Xiangyu Wu, Yan Guo, Pengchong Fu, Angyang Sun, Ju Peng, Jie Zheng, Pengfei Yu and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Transposase-Assisted Donor Tethering Boosts Large-Fragment HDR in Plants.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaixuan GaoGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Xuedi ZhangGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Zhenwu ZhangGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Xiangyu WuGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Yan GuoGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Pengchong FuGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Angyang SunGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Ju PengGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Jie ZhengGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Pengfei YuGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Tengfei WangGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Qinying YeGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Jingwei JiangGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Haopeng WangGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Chao-Po LinGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.
Guanjun GaoGene Editing Center, School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3535-8681
ShanghaiTech University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomes can be edited by homologous recombination stimulated by CRISPR/Cas9 [clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated peptide 9]-induced DNA double-strand breaks. However, this approach is inefficient for inserting or deleting long fragments in mammalian cells. Here, we describe a simple genome-editing method, termed transcription-coupled Cas9-mediated editing (TEd), that can achieve higher efficiencies than canonical Cas9-mediated editing (CEd) in deleting genomic fragments, inserting/replacing large DNA fragments and introducing point mutations into mammalian cell lines. We also found that the transcription on DNA templates is crucial for the promotion of homology-directed repair, and that tethering transcripts from TEd donors to targeted sites further improves editing efficiency. The superior efficiency of TEd for the insertion and deletion of long DNA fragments expands the applications of CRISPR for editing mammalian genomes.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingAnimalsDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedHomologous RecombinationMammalsDNA

Identifiers

PMID35929067
PMCPMC9638910
OpenAlexW4289939894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.