ArticleFederal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS2022
Reading Chekhov on the Cancer Ward.
Article in Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Studies have shown that nonmedical reading is associated with low burnout and that small group study sections can promote wellness. Burnout and other psychosocial distress are common among health care professionals, necessitating additional measures to promote well-being. The field of narrative medicine is one proposed solution. Observations: We added small narrative medicine group discussions of nonmedical fiction to our hematology oncology clinical program to promote physician resilience and decrease risk for burnout. We explored how reading and reflecting would result in profound changes in thinking and feeling and noted 7 different ways by which reading and reflecting together can increase well-being. We describe how stories led us to increase bonding, improve empathy, and promote meaning in medicine. Conclusions: Our small group discussions showed that the intervention was feasible, improved empathy and fulfillment at work, and resulted in greater appreciation for the human dimensions of health care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.