ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2022
Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Study on the Efficiency and Mechanism of a Novel Copper-Based Composite Material Activated by Supramolecular Self-Assembly for Degrading Reactive Red 3BS.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A series of quaternary ammonium salt antibacterial agents synthesized and prepared for constructing and screening antibacterial coatings with biosafety on polypropylene.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Dimensional effects of surface morphology and trapped air on mammalian cell adhesion to special wetting surfaces.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Article
- Decoding the regulatory networks ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Influence of a Composite Polylysine-Polydopamine-Quaternary Ammonium Salt Coating on Titanium on Its Ostogenic and Antibacterial Performance.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- New insights into the prevention of ureteral stents encrustation.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ureteral stents are commonly utilized as a medical device to aid the flow of urine. However, biofilm formation and encrustation complications have been clinical problems. To overcome this challenge, heparin/poly-L-lysine-copper (Hep/PLL-Cu) nanoparticle was immobilized on a dopamine-coated polyurethane surface (PU/NPs). The stability and structural properties of the nanoparticles were characterized by Zeta potential, poly dispersion index, transmission electron microscopy, atom force microscopy and contact angle. The surface composition, antibacterial potency, encrustation resistance rate and biocompatibility of PU/NPs were investigated by scanning electron microscope, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, antibacterial assay and MTS assay, respectively. In addition, the anti-encrustation property was studied by implanting coated NPs stents in the rat bladder for 7 days. It was shown that the size and distribution of Hep/PLL-Cu nanoparticles were uniform. PU/NPs could inhibit
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.