Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928985›Full record

ArticleArchives of nephrology and renal studies2022

The RiVUR Study Outcomes and Implications on the Management of Vesicoureteral Reflux.

Tiffany Damm, Ranjiv Mathews

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of nephrology and renal studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tiffany DammSouthern Illinois University Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, 747 N. Rutledge, 5th floor Springfield, IL 62702-9665, USA.
Ranjiv MathewsSouthern Illinois University Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, 747 N. Rutledge, 5th floor Springfield, IL 62702-9665, USA.
Southern Illinois University School of Medicine · US

Funding

Randomized Intervention for Vesico-Ureteral Reflux (RIVUR) TrialU01DK074082 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, MING-HSIEN · 2005 to 2012
$2.5M
NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK074082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Randomized intervention for Vesicoureteral Reflux (RiVUR) study was an effort by the National Institute of Health to identify the most significant question on the management of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), i.e. Did antibiotic prophylaxis reduce the incidence of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) in children with VUR? During the initial phases of the RiVUR study, several similar studies were performed that seemed to indicate a lack of benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis in VUR. However, few of these studies had the rigorous methodology and true randomization of the pediatric cohort that was studied in RiVUR. Additionally, many of these studies included children of wide age ranges and inconsistent assessments were used for identification of UTI and VUR. In 2011, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) published a guideline statement for the evaluation of initial UTI in febrile children aged 2 to 24 months, which recommended against performing a Voiding Cystourethrogram (VCUG) in all children with a confirmed UTI. The goal of the AAP guidelines was to reduce the number of VCUGs being performed and potentially to reduce the number of children diagnosed with low grade VUR that seems to have low potential to cause renal injury. The RiVUR study included over 600 children identified with VUR after a 1

Indexed as

Antimicrobial prophylaxisBladder and bowel dysfunctionReflux nephropathyRiVUR trialUreteral reimplantationVesicoureteral reflux

Identifiers

PMID35928985
PMCPMC9348554
OpenAlexW4289993858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.