ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Efficacy Analysis of Endovascular Therapy for Nonthrombotic Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome Combined with Chronic Venous Insufficiency.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Haemodynamic study of left nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions: a preliminary report.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This research is aimed at elucidating the clinical efficacy of balloon dilatation (BD) plus stent implantation for nonthrombotic iliac vein compression syndrome (NIVCS) combined with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) in different compression positions. Methods: Sixty-five NIVCS patients comorbid with CVI admitted between December 2015 and April 2020 were selected and assigned to two groups according to different iliac vein compression positions. Both groups of patients received iliac vein BD + stent implantation, with the difference lying in that the tip of the stent was inserted 0.5-1 cm into the inferior vena cava (IVC) in the experimental group versus 2-3 cm in the control group. The technical success rate, the postoperative venous clinical severity score (VCSS), and the incidence of complications were compared. Results: The technical success rate of both groups was 100%. Patients were followed up for 12-36 months (average: 25.5 ± 6.2). Decreases in VCSS were observed in both cohorts at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively compared with the preoperative scores, but with no statistical difference. There was no death, nor related complications such as restenosis and lower limb deep vein thrombosis during the follow-up period, with no statistical difference in the incidence of complications between groups. Conclusions: BD + stent implantation is a safe and effective treatment for NIVCS with few complications and remarkable short-term and medium-term effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.