Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928935›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Machine learning models of clinically relevant biomarkers for the prediction of stable obstructive coronary artery disease.

Juntae Kim, Su Yeon Lee, Byung Hee Cha, Wonseop Lee, JiWung Ryu, Young Hak Chung, Dongmin Kim, Seong-Hoon Lim, Tae Soo Kang, Byoung-Eun Park and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06178900 (A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Trial to Verify the Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost-effectiveness of AI-Gatekeeper, a Multimodal AI Software, in Assisting the Screening of Coronary Artery Stenosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06178900 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Comparative Clinical Trial to Verify the Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost-effectiveness of AI-Gatekeeper, a Multimodal AI Software, in Assisting the Screening of Coronary Artery Stenosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorINFINITT HealthcareRan2024 to 2025Enrolled450ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease, DiagnosisArmsAssisted by the AI-Gatekeeper software group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An Improved Diagnostic of theDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Machine Learning Models for Data-Driven Prediction of Diabetes by Lifestyle Type.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juntae KimDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan-si, South Korea.
Su Yeon LeeDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan-si, South Korea.
Byung Hee ChaCNAI, Seoul, South Korea.
Wonseop LeeCNAI, Seoul, South Korea.
JiWung RyuDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan-si, South Korea.
Young Hak ChungDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan-si, South Korea.
Dongmin KimDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan-si, South Korea.
Seong-Hoon LimDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan-si, South Korea.
Tae Soo KangDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan-si, South Korea.
Byoung-Eun ParkDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan-si, South Korea.
Myung-Yong LeeDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan-si, South Korea.
Sungsoo ChoDepartment of Cardiology, Heart and Brain Hospital, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong, South Korea.
Dankook University Hospital · KRChung-Ang University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), evaluation using a pre-test probability model is the key element for diagnosis; however, its accuracy is controversial. This study aimed to develop machine learning (ML) models using clinically relevant biomarkers to predict the presence of stable obstructive CAD and to compare ML models with an established pre-test probability of CAD models. Methods: Eight machine learning models for prediction of obstructive CAD were trained on a cohort of 1,312 patients [randomly split into the training (80%) and internal validation sets (20%)]. Twelve clinical and blood biomarker features assessed on admission were used to inform the models. We compared the best-performing ML model and established the pre-test probability of CAD (updated Diamond-Forrester and CAD consortium) models. Results: The CatBoost algorithm model showed the best performance (area under the receiver operating characteristics, AUROC, 0.796, and 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.740-0.853; Matthews correlation coefficient, MCC, 0.448) compared to the seven other algorithms. The CatBoost algorithm model improved risk prediction compared with the CAD consortium clinical model (AUROC 0.727; 95% CI 0.664-0.789; MCC 0.313). The accuracy of the ML model was 74.6%. Age, sex, hypertension, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, hemoglobin A1c, triglyceride, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels contributed most to obstructive CAD prediction. Conclusion: The ML models using clinically relevant biomarkers provided high accuracy for stable obstructive CAD prediction. In real-world practice, employing such an approach could improve discrimination of patients with suspected obstructive CAD and help select appropriate non-invasive testing for ischemia.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecoronary artery diseasemachine learningpersonalized medicinestable angina pectoris

Identifiers

PMID35928935
PMCPMC9343708
OpenAlexW4285793878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.