ArticleUrology practice2022
Chemotherapy Utilization in Men with Advanced Penile Cancer.
Article in Urology practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patterns of chemotherapy use with primary radiotherapy for localized bladder cancer in patients 65 or older.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Patterns of Treatment and Outcomes in Older Men With Penile Cancer: A SEER Dataset Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Although studies using mixed insurance populations suggest that chemotherapy use in men with advanced penile cancer (PC) is low, it is unclear what regimens are being utilized. In this study, we use a database of insured patients to better understand specific chemotherapy utilization in men with PC. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with stage IIIB or IV PC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare database (2004-2015). Standard of care (SOC) chemotherapy was defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® guidelines: 4 cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil with cisplatin in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or primary setting. We calculated what proportion of patients receive SOC or any chemotherapy within 2 years of diagnosis and analyzed what factors were associated with receiving chemotherapy. Results: Our study included 147 patients-48 stage IIIB and 99 stage IV. Of these patients, 49 (33%) received chemotherapy. Less than 5% of men received SOC. About 10% received SOC chemotherapy but an insufficient number of cycles. Married men were more likely to undergo chemotherapy (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.5-7.8). Less than 5% of the 24 Black or Hispanic patients received chemotherapy compared to 37% of white patients (p <0.001). Conclusions: Only a third of men with stage IIIB/IV PC underwent chemotherapy. Less than 5% of men received complete guideline-based regimens. Whether this is driven primarily by patient or provider factors is unknown, although social determinants of health may play a role. These data highlight the difficulty for patients with PC to get chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.