ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Image-guided interstitial brachytherapy for recurrent cervical cancer after radiotherapy: A single institution experience.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Novel Three-Dimension Printed Individualized Curved-Needle-Based Interstitial Brachytherapy for Re-Irradiation in Uterine Fundus-Involving Recurrent Cervical Cancer: A Case Report.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Prognostic factors and outcomes of CT-guided Iodine-125 seed brachytherapy for retroperitoneal lymph node metastases from a previously irradiated field in cervical carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Re-irradiation in oligorecurrence and oligometastatic cervical cancer in modern radiotherapy era.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Technical report on the first clinical use of a bioabsorbable PGA spacer in HDR brachytherapy for recurrent cervical cancer.Journal of radiation research · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of 3-dimensional printing noncoplanar template (3D-PNCT)-assisted high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) for reirradiation of recurrent cervical cancer: a prospective cohort.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Advances in the field of developing biomarkers for re-irradiation: a how-to guide to small, powerful data sets and artificial intelligence.Expert review of precision medicine and drug development · 2024Article
- Development and Assessment of Interstitial Brachytherapy Using Individual Curved-Needle in Treatment of Recurrent Gynecological Tumors After External Beam Radiotherapy.Technology in cancer research & treatmentObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of image-guided high-dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) for the reirradiation of cervical cancer within a previously irradiated area. Methods and materials: Twenty-three consecutive patients with cervical cancer were reirradiated with curative intent using brachytherapy (BT) with or without external beam irradiation. The median biologically equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) for reirradiation was 64.0 Gy (range: 31.3-95.1 Gy), and the median cumulative EQD2 (for primary treatment and reirradiation) was 152.4 Gy (range: 97.8-200.9 Gy). The average clinical target volume was 82.9 cm Results: The median follow-up time was 19 months (range: 2-59 months). The complete response rate after reirradiation was 56.5%. The 1-, 2- 3-, and 4-year post-relapse survival (PRS) rates were 65.2%, 43.5%, 33.8%, and 27.1%, respectively. The median reirradiation EQD2 D2cc of rectum and bladder was 39.5 Gy (range = 14.6-96.2 Gy) and 52.1 Gy (range = 29.1-114.2 Gy). The median cumulative EQD2 D2cc of rectum and bladder was 115.0 Gy (range = 84.4-189.3 Gy) and 130.5 Gy (range = 95.5-173.5 Gy). During follow-up, nine (39.1%) patients had experienced grade 3 or 4 late toxicities. Grade ≥3 rectal toxicity occurred in three patients (13.0%). Grade ≥3 urinary toxicity occurred in five patients (21.7%). One patient (4.3%) had both grade ≥3 urinary and rectal toxicity. Tumor volume, TFI, tumor invasion organ number, and local control were significant prognostic factors adversely affecting OS. Conclusions: For recurrent cervical cancer after radiotherapy, reirradiation of HDR-ISBT is feasible, even if the local tumor invasion is large, with a good chance of survival and acceptable side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.