Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928806›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2022

Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health-supported relative citation ratio among American orthopedic spine surgery faculty: A new bibliometric measure of scientific influence.

Christopher N Dijanic, Suleiman Y Sudah, Christopher R Michel, Tiffany A Smith, Aneesh Patankar, Joseph E Manzi, Robert D Faccone, Daniel J Kerrigan, Mariano E Menendez, Jason Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christopher N DijanicDepartment of Orthopedics, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USA.
Suleiman Y SudahDepartment of Orthopedics, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USA.
Christopher R MichelDepartment of Orthopedics, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USA.
Tiffany A SmithRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Aneesh PatankarRutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Joseph E ManziWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Robert D FacconeDepartment of Research, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, AL, USA.
Daniel J KerriganDepartment of Orthopedics, Monmouth Medical Center, Long Branch, NJ, USA.
Mariano E MenendezMidwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jason CohenProfessional Orthopedic Associates, Tinton Falls, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Publication metrics have been traditionally used to compare research productivity amongst academic faculty. However, traditional bibliometrics lack field-normalization and are often biased towards time-dependent publication factors. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has developed a new, field-normalized, article-level metric, known as the "relative citation ratio" (RCR), that can be used to make accurate self, departmental, and cross-specialty comparisons of research productivity. This study evaluates the use of the RCR amongst academic orthopedic spine surgery faculty and analyzes physician factors associated with RCR values. Methods: A retrospective data analysis was performed using the iCite database for all fellowship trained orthopedic spine surgery (OSS) faculty associated with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopedic surgery residency program. Mean RCR, weighted RCR, and total publication count were compared by sex, career duration, academic rank, and presence of additional degrees. A value of 1.0 is the NIH-funded field-normalized standard. Student t-tests were used for two-group analyses whereas the analysis of variance tests (ANOVA) was used for between-group comparisons of three or more subgroups. Statistical significance was achieved at P < 0.05. Results: A total of 502 academic OSS faculty members from 159 institutions were included in the analysis. Overall, OSS faculty were highly productive, with a median RCR of 1.62 (IQR 1.38-2.32) and a median weighted RCR of 68.98 (IQR 21.06-212.70). Advancing academic rank was associated with weighted RCR, career longevity was associated with mean RCR score, and male sex was associated with having increased mean and weighted RCR scores. All subgroups analyzed had an RCR value above 1.0. Conclusions: Academic orthopedic spine surgery faculty produce impactful research as evidenced by the high median RCR relative to the standard value set by the NIH of 1.0. Our data can be used to evaluate research productivity in the orthopedic spine community.

Indexed as

BibliometricOrthopedic surgeryRelative citation ratio (RCR)Research productivitySpineSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID35928806
PMCPMC9344340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.