ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2022
Artificial intelligence and anesthesia: a narrative review.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning-augmented interventions in perioperative care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.British journal of anaesthesia · 2024Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-assisted interventions for perioperative anesthetic management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- From prediction to practice: closing the translation gap in artificial intelligence for anesthesia.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Review
- Article
- A pre-trained language model approach for triaging surgical patients for preoperative anesthesia clinics.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Comparison of human-AI agreement in ASA scoring by gender and duration of clinical experience: a real-world study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Anesthesia for cesarean delivery in the era of artificial intelligence: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
- Advancing a Hybrid Decision-Making Model in Anesthesiology: Applications of Artificial Intelligence in the Perioperative Setting.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Difficult Airways: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- From static to dynamic: Artificial intelligence revolution in perioperative care through multimodal data fusion and closed-loop optimization.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Thoracic segmental spinal anaesthesia: expanding applications while keeping it safe.British journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- Comparison of AI applications and anesthesiologist's anesthesia method choices.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Reshaping Anesthesia with Artificial Intelligence: From Concept to Reality.Anesthesia and critical care (Houston, Tex.) · 2025Article
- A Review of Agentic AI in Cybersecurity: Cognitive Autonomy, Ethical Governance, and Quantum-Resilient Defense.F1000Research · 2025Review
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Anaesthesiology: Enhancing Patient Outcomes and Clinical Efficiency.Cureus · 2024Review
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Perioperative Care: Opportunities and Challenges.Anesthesiology · 2024Article
- Article
- A review of the current status and progress in difficult airway assessment research.European journal of medical research · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: The aim of this narrative review is to analyze whether or not artificial intelligence (AI) and its subsets are implemented in current clinical anesthetic practice, and to describe the current state of the research in the field. AI is a general term which refers to all the techniques that enable computers to mimic human intelligence. AI is based on algorithms that gives machines the ability to reason and perform functions such as problem-solving, object and word recognition, inference of world states, and decision-making. It includes machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL). Methods: We performed a narrative review of the literature on Scopus, PubMed and Cochrane databases. The research string comprised various combinations of "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "anesthesia", "anesthesiology". The databases were searched independently by two authors. A third reviewer would mediate any disagreement the results of the two screeners. Key Content and Findings: The application of AI has shown excellent results in both anesthesia and in operating room (OR) management. In each phase of the perioperative process, pre-, intra- and postoperative ones, it is able to perform different and specific tasks, using various techniques. Conclusions: Thanks to the use of these new technologies, even anesthesia, as it is happening for other disciplines, is going through a real revolution, called Anesthesia 4.0. However, AI is not free from limitations and open issues. Unfortunately, the models created, provided they have excellent performance, have not yet entered daily practice. Clinical impact analyzes and external validations are needed before this happens. Therefore, qualitative research will be needed to better understand the ethical, cultural, and societal implications of integrating AI into clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.