ReviewReproduction & fertility2022
Potential ovarian toxicity and infertility risk following targeted anti-cancer therapies.
Review in Reproduction & fertility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of BRCA mutation and hormone receptor status on the outcomes of fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Reproductive considerations in patients undergoing treatment for complex lymphatic anomalies.Journal of vascular anomalies · 2026Article
- Cancer-like Hallmarks of Endometriosis: The Role of Estrogen Signaling and Stem Cell Plasticity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Protective Effects of Adenosine Triphosphate and Flunarizine on Erlotinib-Induced Ovarian Damage: An Experimental Study.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Impact of Conventional Chemotherapy Regimens and Targeted Drugs on Ovarian Function in Breast Cancer Patients.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in ovarian cancer: transforming detection, treatment, and prevention.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Gonadotoxicity of immunotherapy and targeted agents in patients with cancer and impact on subsequent pregnancies.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Ovarian function in adolescents and young adults undergoing cancer treatment: biochemical and ultrasound marker analysis.Endocrine connections · 2025Article
- The Protective Effect of GnRH Agonist Triptorelin on the Histomorphometric Parameters of the Utero-ovarian Tissue in the Doxorubicin- and Cyclophosphamide-treated Mice.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Article
- Extensive homologous recombination safeguards oocyte genome integrity in mammals.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Fertility preservation before and after cancer treatment in children, adolescents, and young adults.Cancer · 2024Review
- CHEK2 signaling is the key regulator of oocyte survival after chemotherapy.Science advances · 2023Article
- Making a good egg: human oocyte health, aging, and in vitro development.Physiological reviews · 2023Review
- What are the most common controversial clinical issues in fertility preservation? A content analysis of a collaborative professional online consultation group.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023Article
- The future of fertility preservation for women treated with chemotherapy.Reproduction & fertility · 2023Article
- A gene signature driven by abnormally methylated DEGs was developed for TP53 wild-type ovarian cancer samples by integrative omics analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression data.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Unlike traditional chemotherapy agents which are generally cytotoxic to all cells, targeted anti-cancer therapies are designed to specifically target proliferation mechanisms in cancer cells but spare normal cells, resulting in high potency and reduced toxicity. There has therefore been a rapid increase in their development and use in clinical settings, including in curative-intent treatment regimens. However, the targets of some of these drugs including kinases, epigenetic regulatory proteins, DNA damage repair enzymes and proteasomes, have fundamental roles in governing normal ovarian physiology. Inhibiting their action could have significant consequences for ovarian function, with potentially long-lasting adverse effects which persist after cessation of treatment, but there is limited evidence of their effects on reproductive function. In this review, we will use literature that examines these pathways to infer the potential toxicity of targeted anti-cancer drugs on the ovary. Lay summary: Compared to traditional chemotherapy agents, anti-cancer therapies are thought to be highly effective at targeting cancer cells but sparing normal cells, resulting in reduced drug side effects. However, many of processes within the cells that these drugs affect are also important for the ovary to work normally, so suppressing them in this way could have long-lasting implications for female fertility. This review examines the potential toxicity of anti-cancer therapies on the ovary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.