Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928646›Full record

ArticlePerspectives in clinical research

Prescription audit of a teaching hospital in South India using World Health Organization core prescribing indicators - A cross-sectional study.

R Meenakshi, Nitya Selvaraj, Nishanthi Anandabaskar, Anuranjani Dhamodharan, A K Badrinath, Meher Ali Rajamohammad

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives in clinical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R MeenakshiDepartment of Pharmacology, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India.
Nitya SelvarajDepartment of Pharmacology, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India.
Nishanthi AnandabaskarDepartment of Pharmacology, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India.
Anuranjani DhamodharanDepartment of Pharmacology, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India.
A K BadrinathDepartment of General Medicine, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India.
Meher Ali RajamohammadDepartment of Pharmacology, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital, Puducherry, India.
Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: World Health Organization (WHO) core prescribing indicators are highly standardized tools in reliably assessing the essential aspects of drug utilization pattern. It is critical that the rational use of drug prescribing is scrutinized for the utmost benefit of patient welfare. In this study, we aim to assess the prescription pattern and prescribing behavior of physicians using the WHO-recommended core prescribing indicators at a teaching hospital in South India. Materials and Methods: A prospective, descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the general medicine outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital for a period of 1 month in June 2019. A total of 600 prescriptions were sampled based on the WHO "How to investigate drug use in health facilities" document recommendation. The WHO guidelines and methods were observed to ensure data reliability. Descriptive statistical analyses such as frequencies, percentages, mean, and standard deviation were used to present the data. Results: The WHO core prescribing indicators analysis revealed that the average number of drugs per encounter was 2.38 ± 1.1 and only 796 (55.4%) of the drugs were prescribed by generic name. Whereas, the percentage of encounters prescribed with an antibiotic 44 (7.3%) and an injection 63 (10.5%) was less than the ideal recommendations as per WHO and 1265 (88%) of the drugs were prescribed from the National List of Essential Medicines. Conclusion: This study on prescription pattern audit done using the WHO core prescribing indicators highlights that prescriptions encountered with antibiotic and injection use were in accordance with the WHO recommendations.

Indexed as

Fixed-dose combinationgeneric drugsprescribing indicatorsprescribing patternprescription auditrational prescribing

Identifiers

PMID35928646
PMCPMC9345256
OpenAlexW3119566545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.