Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928599›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in environmental science2022

CaFÉ: A Sensitive, Low-Cost Filtration Method for Detecting Polioviruses and Other Enteroviruses in Residual Waters.

Hanen Belgasmi, Stacey Jeffries Miles, Leanna Sayyad, Kimberly Wong, Chelsea Harrington, Nancy Gerloff, Angela D Coulliette-Salmond, Ratigorn Guntapong, Ratana Tacharoenmuang, Apiradee Isarangkul Na Ayutthaya and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in environmental science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Hanen BelgasmiPolio and Picornavirus Laboratory Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Stacey Jeffries MilesPolio and Picornavirus Laboratory Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Leanna SayyadCherokee Nation Assurance, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Kimberly WongCherokee Nation Assurance, Tulsa, OK, United States.
Chelsea HarringtonPolio and Picornavirus Laboratory Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Nancy GerloffPolio and Picornavirus Laboratory Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Angela D Coulliette-SalmondPolio and Picornavirus Laboratory Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Ratigorn GuntapongDepartment of Medical Science, Enteric Viruses Section, National Institute of Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Ratana TacharoenmuangDepartment of Medical Science, Enteric Viruses Section, National Institute of Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Apiradee Isarangkul Na AyutthayaDepartment of Medical Science, Enteric Viruses Section, National Institute of Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Lea Necitas G ApostolResearch Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.
Ma Anne-Lesley D ValenciaResearch Institute for Tropical Medicine, Muntinlupa City, Philippines.
Cara C BurnsPolio and Picornavirus Laboratory Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Gloria-Rey BenitoPan American Health Organization, World Health Organization, Washington, DC, United States.
Everardo VegaPolio and Picornavirus Laboratory Branch, Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USNational Institute of Health of Thailand · THCherokee Nation · USResearch Institute for Tropical Medicine · PHWorld Health Organization Regional Office for the Americas · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance has been used to identify polio cases and target vaccination campaigns since the inception of the Global Poliovirus Eradication Initiative (GPEI) in 1988. To date, only Afghanistan and Pakistan have failed to interrupt wild poliovirus transmission. Circulation of vaccine-derived polioviruses (VDPV) continues to be a problem in high-risk areas of the Eastern Mediterranean, African, and Southeast Asian regions. Environmental surveillance (ES) is an important adjunct to AFP surveillance, helping to identify circulating polioviruses in problematic areas. Stools from AFP cases and contacts (>200,000 specimens/year) and ES samples (>642 sites) are referred to 146 laboratories in the Global Polio Laboratory Network (GPLN) for testing. Although most World Health Organization supported laboratories use the two-phase separation method due to its simplicity and effectiveness, alternative simple, widely available, and cost-effective methods are needed. The CAFÉ (Concentration and Filtration Elution) method was developed from existing filtration methods to handle any type of sewage or residual waters. At $10-20 US per sample for consumable materials, CAFÉ is cost effective, and all equipment and reagents are readily available from markets and suppliers globally. The report describes the results from a parallel study of CAFÉ method with the standard two-phase separation method. The study was performed with samples collected from five countries (Guatemala, Haïti, Thailand, Papua New Guinea, and the Philippines), run in three laboratories-(United States, Thailand and in the Philippines) to account for regional and sample-to-sample variability. Samples from each site were divided into two 500 ml aliquots and processed by both methods, with no other additional concentration or manipulation. The results of 338 parallel-tested samples show that the CAFÉ method is more sensitive than the two-phase separation method for detection of non-polio enteroviruses (

Indexed as

enterovirusenvironmental surveillancefiltrationpoliovirustwo-phase separationvaccine-derived polioviruswastewater

Identifiers

PMID35928599
PMCPMC9344547
OpenAlexW4283804182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.