Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928594›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2022

Cancer disparities related to poverty and rurality for 22 top cancers in Florida.

Jaclyn M Hall, Sarah M Szurek, Heedeok Cho, Yi Guo, Michael S Gutter, Georges E Khalil, Jonathan D Licht, Elizabeth A Shenkman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mentoring Minority Cancer Researchers of Tomorrow: Comparison of the Face-to-Face, Virtual, and Hybrid Training Methods of the CaREJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jaclyn M HallDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, United States.
Sarah M SzurekDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, United States.
Heedeok ChoDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, United States.
Yi GuoDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, United States.
Michael S GutterDepartment of Family, Youth and Community Sciences, University of Florida, United States.
Georges E KhalilDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, United States.
Jonathan D LichtDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida Cancer Center, United States.
Elizabeth A ShenkmanDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to examine poverty and rurality as potential predictors of cancer health disparities. This cross-sectional study used data from the Florida Cancer Data System on all cancer diagnoses in the years 2014-2018 to determine age-adjusted incidence and mortality (per 100,000 population) for the 22 most common cancer sites within rural and urban counties, and high poverty and low poverty communities. Rural/urban and high/low poverty related cancer disparities were tested for statistical significance using the Rate Ratio statistical test. Overall cancer incidence was significantly lower in rural areas than in urban, but significantly higher in high poverty communities. Rurality and poverty were both associated with disparity in cancer incidence risk for tobacco-related cancers. The overall mortality was 22% higher in high poverty areas compared to low poverty areas. Ten cancer sites had mortality disparity from 83% to 17% higher in high poverty areas. Only three cancer sites, all tobacco-related, had higher mortality in rural areas than urban areas, demonstrating the intersectional nature of inhaled and smokeless tobacco use in rural low-income communities. Cancer and mortality rates in rural and urban areas may be largely driven by poverty. The high disparities related to high poverty areas reflects poor access to preventative care and treatment. Low income communities, rural or urban, will require focused efforts to address challenges specific to each population.

Indexed as

CancerDisparitiesPovertyPreventionRuralityUrban

Identifiers

PMID35928594
PMCPMC9344025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.