ArticleAME case reports2022
Major acetabular prosthetic protrusion following total hip arthroplasty: a case report of a reconstruction challenge.
Article in AME case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acetabular protrusion is an acetabular defect caused by the shift of the femoral head through the pelvic bone. Because of bone loss, usual anatomical landmarks may be confusing or absent, leading to a particularly high demanding surgical reconstruction in case of total hip arthroplasty (THA) implantation, without adequate support of the acetabulum due to major acetabular defect. To our knowledge, no article has dealt with acetabular defects to this extent and associated femoral osteolysis, which we will attempt to do in this case report. That's why we would like to share this case in order to propose an interesting alternative for the management of these challenging pathologies. Case Description: We hereby present the case of a rare pattern of severe acetabular prosthetic protrusion through the pelvic ring on a 77-year-old patient without any trauma. He was surgically treated with acetabular metal augment and a wide femoral modular reconstruction prosthesis. An instability was revealed after 6 weeks, so he underwent an early surgical revision with a constraint cup, overwhelming the absence of abductor apparatus. After this, his recovery was complete and uneventful, with effective function of the reconstructed hip joint and adequate stability of the prosthesis. Conclusions: Although acetabular protrusion is a rare complication in total hip replacement patients, we would like to draw attention to the challenging nature of this complication, both in terms of initial assessment and surgical management. The described strategy showed effective function of the reconstructed hip joint and final adequate stability of the prosthesis despite the absence of a competent abductor apparatus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.