Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928553›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2022

Socioeconomic status, cardiovascular risk profile, and premature coronary heart disease.

Safi U Khan, Ryan T Nguyen, Zulqarnain Javed, Maninder Singh, Javier Valero-Elizondo, Miguel Cainzos-Achirica, Khurram Nasir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Financial hardship and major adverse cardiovascular events: The role of advanced cardiac imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Safi U KhanDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ryan T NguyenDepartment of Medicine, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA.
Zulqarnain JavedDivision of Health Equity and Disparities Research, USA.
Maninder SinghGuthrie Health System/Robert Packer Hospital, Sayre, PA, USA.
Javier Valero-ElizondoCenter for Outcomes Research, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA.
Miguel Cainzos-AchiricaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Khurram NasirDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Houston Methodist · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The combined influence of traditional cardiovascular risk factors and socioeconomic status (SES) on premature CHD (<65 years) remains understudied. Methods: We used the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) database (2012-2018) to examine the association of sociodemographic (income, education, insurance status) and cardiovascular risk profile (CRF: ranging from optimal (0-1 risk CV factor) to poor (≥4 risk CV factors)) with CHD in young (18- 44 years) and middle-aged (45-64 years) adults. Results: Among the 168,969 included adults (young: 46.6%), the prevalence of CHD was 3%, translating to 6.4 million young and middle-aged adults. Adults with low family income, lesser education and no insurance were more likely to have CHD. While majority of young adults (65%) had optimal CRF profile and only 4% had poor CRF profile, 26% of middle-aged adults carried poor CRF profile. When examined by income status, education, and insurance status, odds of CHD were increased with worsening CRF profile. In multivariate regressions, low income participants who had a poor CRF (reference: optimal CRF) had higher odds of CHD in both young (aOR: 9.12 [95% CI, 6.16-13.50]) and middle-aged adults (aOR: 8.22 [95% CI, 6.12-11.05]). Within participants with a high school education or lower, those with a poor CRF profile (reference: optimal CRF) had increased odds of CHD in young (aOR: 10.35 [95% CI, 6.66-16.11]) and middle-aged adults (aOR: 10.40 [95% CI, 7.91-13.66]). In the uninsured, those with a poor CRF profile (reference: optimal CRF) had an 8-9 fold increased odds of CHD in young (aOR: 7.65 [95% CI, 4.26-13.73]) and middle-aged adults (aOR: 9.34 [95% CI, 5.90-14.79]). Conclusions: In this national survey, individuals with poor CRF profile had higher odds of premature CHD than those with optimal profile, and burden of CHD increased with worsening of CRF profile.

Indexed as

ACC, American College of CardiologyAHA, American Heart AssociationaOR, adjusted odds ratioCHD, coronary heart diseaseCI, confidence intervalCoronary heart diseaseCV, cardiovascularEpidemiologyNHIS, National Health Interview SurveyOR, odds ratioSES, socioeconomic statusSocioeconomic statusUS, United States

Identifiers

PMID35928553
PMCPMC9344344
OpenAlexW4287881682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.