Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928521›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of psychotraumatology2022

The child and Adolescent Trauma Screen 2 (CATS-2) - validation of an instrument to measure DSM-5 and ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in children and adolescents.

Cedric Sachser, Lucy Berliner, Elizabeth Risch, Rita Rosner, Marianne S Birkeland, Rebekka Eilers, Gertrud S Hafstad, Elisa Pfeiffer, Paul L Plener, Tine K Jensen

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of psychotraumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06038357 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of "Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools" (CBITS) in Child Welfare Programs in Germany: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital UlmRan2023 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsPosttraumatic Stress DisorderArmsCBITS, TAU+
NCT06384508 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of a Virtual Reality Intervention on Trauma-related Shame in Sexually Abused Adolescents: A Single-case Experimental Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversiteit LeidenRan2025 to 2025Enrolled6ConditionsShameArmsSHINE-VR
NCT07052474 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Intensive Trauma-Focused Treatment for Adolescents With Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): Feasibility and Preliminary Effects

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2024 to 2025Enrolled20ConditionsPTSD - Post Traumatic Stress DisorderArmsIntensive trauma-focused treatment
NCT07368166 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Development of the PTSD-iMPACT to Measure PTSD-Related Functional Impairment in Children and Adolescents - A Validation Study in Switzerland and Germany

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Children's Hospital, ZurichRan2025 to 2026Enrolled1,200ConditionsPTSD - Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, PTSD-Related Functional Impairment in Children and Adolescents
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Cedric SachserDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9353-7936
Lucy BerlinerHarborview Center for Sexual Assault and Traumatic Stress, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Elizabeth RischCenter on Child Abuse and Neglect, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OH, USA.
Rita RosnerDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany.
Marianne S BirkelandNorwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway.
Rebekka EilersDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany.
Gertrud S HafstadNorwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway.
Elisa PfeifferDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Paul L PlenerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Tine K JensenNorwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway.
Universität Ulm · DECatholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt · DENorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies · NOUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center · USUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The study examined the psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen 2 (CATS-2) as a measure of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) according to DSM-5 and (Complex) PTSD following the ICD-11 criteria in children and adolescents (7-17 years). Methods: Psychometric properties were investigated in an international sample of traumatized children and adolescents ( Results: The DSM-5 total score (self: α = .89; caregiver: α = .91), the ICD-11 PTSD total score (self: α = .67; caregiver: α = .79) and the ICD-11 CPTSD total score (self: α = .83; caregiver: α = .87) have proven acceptable to excellent reliability. The latent structure of the 12-item ICD-11 PTSD/CPTSD construct was consistent with prior findings. Latent profile analyses revealed that ICD-11 CPTSD was empirically distinguishable from ICD-11 PTSD using the CATS-2. ROC-analysis using the CAPS-CA-5 as outcome revealed that CATS-2 DSM-5 PTSD scores of ≥21 (screening) to ≥25 (diagnostic) were optimally efficient for detecting probable DSM-5 PTSD diagnosis. For the ICD-11 PTSD scale scores of ≥7 (screening) to ≥9 (diagnostic) were optimally efficient for detecting probable DSM-5 PTSD diagnosis. Conclusions: The CATS-2 is a brief, reliable and valid measure of DSM-5 PTSD, ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD symptomatology in traumatized children and adolescents, allowing crosswalk between diagnostic systems using one measure. HIGHLIGHTS: The CATS-2 screens for potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and PTSD symptoms.The CATS-2 captures DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria for PTSD and CPTSD and enables clinicians and researchers to crosswalk between both diagnostic systems.International validation has proven good psychometric properties and presents cut-off scoresThe CATS-2 is a license-free instrument and is freely accessible.

Indexed as

Adverse Childhood ExperiencesStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesReproducibility of ResultsadolescentsassessmentchildrenDSM-5ICD-11psychometricsPTSDTrauma

Identifiers

PMID35928521
PMCPMC9344962
OpenAlexW4289202518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.