Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928506›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2022

Changing Diagnostic Testing Practices for Foodborne Pathogens, Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 2012-2019.

Logan C Ray, Patricia M Griffin, Katie Wymore, Elisha Wilson, Sharon Hurd, Bethany LaClair, Sophia Wozny, Dana Eikmeier, Cyndy Nicholson, Kari Burzlaff and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Temporal trends ofFrontiers in public health · 2026
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. A Pilot Study to Detect ViableInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Logan C RayDivision of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3456-152X
Patricia M GriffinDivision of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Katie WymoreCalifornia Department of Public Health, Sacramento, California, USA.
Elisha WilsonColorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Sharon HurdConnecticut Emerging Infections Program, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Bethany LaClairGeorgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sophia WoznyMaryland Department of Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Dana EikmeierMinnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Cyndy NicholsonNew Mexico Emerging Infections Program, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Kari BurzlaffNew York State Department of Health, Buffalo, New York, USA.
Julie HatchOregon Health Authority, Salem, Oregon, USA.
Melissa FankhauserTennessee Department of Health, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Kristy KubotaAssociation of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Jennifer Y HuangDivision of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Aimee GeisslerDivision of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Daniel C PayneDivision of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Danielle M TackDivision of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USAssociation of Public Health Laboratories · USCalifornia Department of Public Health · USColorado Department of Public Health and Environment · USGeorgia Department of Public Health · USMaryland Department of Health · USMinnesota Department of Health · USNew York State Department of Health · USOregon Health Authority · USTennessee Department of Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pathogen detection has changed with increased use of culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs). CIDTs do not yield isolates, which are necessary to detect outbreaks using whole-genome sequencing. The Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) monitors clinical laboratory testing practices to improve interpretation of surveillance data and assess availability of isolates. We describe changes in practices over 8 years. Methods: During 2012-2019, 10 FoodNet sites collected standardized data about practices in clinical laboratories (range, 664-723 laboratories) for select enteric pathogens. We assessed changes in practices. Results: During 2012-2019, the percentage of laboratories that used only culture methods decreased, with the largest declines for Conclusions: By increasing use of CIDTs and decreasing reflex culture, clinical laboratories have transferred the burden of isolate recovery to public health laboratories. Until technologies allow for molecular subtyping directly from a patient specimen, state public health laboratories should consider updating enteric disease reporting requirements to include submission of isolates or specimens. Public health laboratories need resources for isolate recovery.

Indexed as

clinical laboratory testing practicesculture-independent diagnostic testFoodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet)foodborne illnessreflex culture

Identifiers

PMID35928506
PMCPMC9345410
OpenAlexW4287577778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.