ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences
Cytogenetic Studies in Primary Amenorrhoea Cases.
Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in infertility treatment: Applications, challenges, and future directions: A narrative review.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2026Review
- Contribution of chromosomal aberrations to the pathogenesis of primary and secondary amenorrhea: A study from Western Iran.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Frequency, clinical presentation and management of primary amenorrhea in a tertiary care setting.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities in the postnatal cohort: A single-center study on 14,242 patients.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2024Article
- Genetic diversity, clinical uses, and phytochemical and pharmacological properties of safflower (Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Amenorrhoea is considered a kind of menstrual disorder in a woman of reproductive age. It is a symptom with many potential causes such as an abnormality in the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, anatomical abnormalities of the genital tract or functional causes. Aims: In this study, we aimed to investigate chromosomal abnormalities in patients presenting with primary amenorrhoea. Study Setting and Design: This study was conducted in the medical genetic laboratory. Materials and Methods: Chromosomal analysis was carried out in 134 cases that were referred to the human genetic laboratory from 2010 to 2017, employing (GTG) Giemsa banding. Statistical Analysis: Statistical analyses were carried out by Microsoft Office Excel (2019). Results: The karyotype results revealed 77.6% ( Conclusion: The present study has emphasised that karyotyping is one of the fundamental investigations in the evaluation of primary amenorrhoea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.