Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928337›Full record

ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2022

A New Evaluation

Ireneusz Iwanowski, Jan Böckhaus, Pascal Richardt, Ingo Kutschka, Gunnar G Hanekop, Martin G Friedrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. 2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Turbulence in surgical suction heads as detected by MRI.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2023
    Article
  7. The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology to Modernize.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ireneusz IwanowskiDepartment of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery.
Jan BöckhausClinic for Nephrology and Rheumatology, and.
Pascal RichardtClinic for Nephrology and Rheumatology, and.
Ingo KutschkaDepartment of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery.
Gunnar G HanekopDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Martin G FriedrichDepartment of Thoracic, Cardiac and Vascular Surgery.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood hemolysis caused by mechanical impact is a serious problem in medicine. In addition to the heart-lung machine (artificial surfaces, flow irritating connection points) which contributes to hemolysis, blood suction and surgical suction devices are influencing factors. Goal of our research is to develop best flow optimizing suction geometry that represents the best compromise between all influencing effects. Based on data that negative pressure and turbulence have a negative impact on blood components, 27 surgical suction tips have been examined for acoustic stress and negative pressure behavior. Furthermore, a dimensionless factor

Indexed as

Blood Transfusion, AutologousCardiopulmonary BypassHeart-Lung MachineHemolysisHumansSuctionblood integrity.blood retransfusioncell-saverflow optimizationnoise in ORretransfusion systemssuction systemssuction tip

Identifiers

PMID35928337
PMCPMC9302399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.