Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928313›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2022

Spheno-orbital meningiomas: Is orbit reconstruction mandatory? Long-term outcomes and exophthalmos improvement.

Alexandra Gomes Dos Santos, Wellingson Silva Paiva, Leila Maria da Roz, Marcelo Prudente do Espirito Santo, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira, Eberval G Figueiredo, Vinicius Trindade Gomes da Silva

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexandra Gomes Dos SantosDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Wellingson Silva PaivaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Leila Maria da RozDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Prudente do Espirito SantoDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Manoel Jacobsen TeixeiraDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Eberval G FigueiredoDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Vinicius Trindade Gomes da SilvaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurology, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRKanazawa University · JPNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Meningiomas correspond to one-third of all primary central nervous system tumors. Approximately 9% of them are spheno-orbital meningiomas (SOMs), presenting significant clinical symptoms as visual impairment and orbital esthetics. This article aims to evaluate exophthalmos' improvement in a surgical series without orbital reconstruction. Methods: We consecutively included all patients diagnosed with SOM, admitted to a single institution for 10 years. Surgical resection was the standard of care, associated or not with adjuvant radiation therapy. The radiological investigation included preoperative and postoperative head CT or MRI. We quantified proptosis through imaging. Results: Forty patients composed this series, 87.5% were female. Proptosis was the most common presentation (90%), followed by decreased visual acuity (65%), motility deficit (20%), and headache (20%). Gross total resection was achieved in 65% of the procedures. In late outcomes, 78% of the patients maintained or improved visual acuity and 85% maintained or improved headache. Proptosis significantly improved after surgery and along with the follow-up ( Conclusion: Resection of SOM was sufficient to stop the evolution of visual deficit and allowed the improvement of proptosis. Orbital reconstruction does not seem to be an essential step in reducing enophthalmos.

Indexed as

Central nervous system tumorExophthalmosGross total resectionMeningiomaOrbit reconstructionSpheno-orbital meningiomas

Identifiers

PMID35928313
PMCPMC9345102
OpenAlexW4286462282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.