Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928236›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR2022

Quality assurance in allied healthcare education: A narrative review.

Jithin K Sreedharan, Arun Vijay Subbarayalu, Saad M AlRabeeah, Manjush Karthika, Madhuragauri Shevade, Musallam Abdullah Al Nasser, Abdullah S Alqahtani

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jithin K SreedharanDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Arun Vijay SubbarayaluQuality Assurance Department, Deanship of Quality and Academic Accreditation, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Saad M AlRabeeahDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Manjush KarthikaDepartment of Respiratory Care, Khawarizmi International College, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
Madhuragauri ShevadeSymbiosis Center for Research and Innovation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Symbiosis International University, Pune.
Musallam Abdullah Al NasserDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah S AlqahtaniDepartment of Respiratory Care, Prince Sultan Military College of Health Sciences, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Prince Sultan Military College of Health SciencesAl Khawarizmi International College · AEImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SASymbiosis International University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There is no standard methodology for outlining the intricacies of allied healthcare education (AHE) or its quality. The profound misconception is that quality assurance (QA) in AHE is used on a "voluntary" basis. Given the absence of statutory regulatory mechanisms such as accreditation, validation, and audit by the peripheral agencies concerning QA, adoption of QA measures in AHE is not consistent, and it results in producing a subpar allied health workforce. This paper analyzes the need to include QA measures as an essential domain in evaluating the effectiveness of allied health professional education programs. Method: A large database search was performed using pertinent terms, and a blueprint was developed for a meticulous literature review published between 2015 and 2021. Five hundred eighty-two articles were found and screened; a critical appraisal was performed for 22 peer-reviewed articles for relevant information. Results: The literature review identified the need to use academic domains such as leadership, planning, delivery, and feedback as QA criteria to evaluate the efficiency of education and training in allied health professional education programs. Instructors and facilitators for specific knowledge and skill development and a description of their roles should also be used in QA evaluation. Conclusion: Resources for effective learning and teaching in the allied healthcare domain are limited. This review highlights the significant need to include a QA system in AHE, considering the pivotal role of these students in supporting humankind, now and in the future. The findings contribute to the research by providing essential insights into current trends and focusing on existing research in AHE quality.

Indexed as

allied healthcare educationallied healthcare professioneducationquality assurance

Identifiers

PMID35928236
PMCPMC9318339
OpenAlexW4288039810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.