ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2022
Uterine Sarcoma: Retrospective Study From A Single institute.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overall Observed Survival of Female Breast, Cervical, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancers in Antigua and Barbuda, 2017-2021: Retrospective Data from Four Study Sites.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker in Uterine Sarcoma.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Orosomucoid 1 is a Potential Prognostic Biomarker for Uterine Sarcoma.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: Uterine sarcomas are heterogeneous group of tumours comprising 1% of gynaecological malignancies. There is lack of concences on optimal treatment of uterine sarcomas. This is because of lack of randomised controlled trials due to rarity of these tumours. Surgical management without spill remains the standard primary treatment. Most of the times uterine sarcomas are diagnosed postoperatively from histopathology report of either myomectomy or hysterectomy. This retrospective study analysed the clinico pathological characteristics, prognostic factors, treatment details and survival outcome of different types of uterine sarcomas. Materials and methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 59 patients of uterine sarcomas. All patients underwent surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation treatment were given according to histopathological report and FIGO stage. Patients were followed up every three months for first two years and then every six months. Disease free survival (DFS) and Overall survival (OS) were calculated. Statistical analysis: The data were summarized using descriptive statistics as mean, percent and range. Survival probabilities were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and the significance of difference between the survival curves were calculate using log-rank test. Results: Uterine sarcomas are rare and aggressive tumours of uterus. Majority of these tumours present in early stage. Surgery remains the main treatment modality. Role of adjuvant radiation treatment remains controversial. Tumour stage is the most important prognostic factor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.