ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2022
Sonographic Estimation of the Fetal Head Circumference: Accuracy and Factors Affecting the Error.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measurement-Oriented Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Automated Fetal Head Biometry in Prenatal Ultrasound.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- An end-to-end pipeline for automated fetal brain segmentation and biometry from 3D SSFP MRI.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Partial dependence of ultrasonically estimated fetal weight on biometric parameters.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Detecting microcephaly and macrocephaly from ultrasound images using artificial intelligence.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Ultrasound-based machine learning models for assisting the prediction of neonatal size and mode of delivery.Therapeutic advances in reproductive healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sonographic measurement of fetal head circumference (HC) is an essential parameter for the estimation of fetal weight as well as in cases with abnormal fetal head size. Since there is a lack of data, the present study was to assess the accuracy of ultrasonographic estimation of fetal HC and to identify factors that affect the accuracy of fetal HC estimation. Material and Methods: A prospective cohort observational study was conducted for a year. Sonographic fetal biometry including HC was performed, and fetal HC was measured postnatally. Measures of accuracy and various factors which affect the accuracy are analyzed. Results: Ultrasonographic HC underestimated actual postnatal HC in 87.5% and overestimated actual HC in 12.5%. Sonographic underestimation of HC persisted throughout gestation and became more pronounced as gestational age increased. Error in HC was statistically significant in those with low liquor and anterior placenta and in those who had instrumental delivery. Parity, fetal presentation, and maternal diabetes did not affect the error in ultrasonographic measurement of head circumference. When the HC was beyond 95th centile on ultrasound, the error detected postnatally was significant (- 14 mm vs. - 8 mm), though not statistically significant ( Conclusion: The ultrasound estimation of fetal HC is associated with significant underestimation of the actual HC measured postnatally. The error in measuring fetal HC increased in those with advanced gestational age, low liquor, and anterior location of the placenta and in those who had instrumental vaginal delivery. The measurement error may have important implications in specific clinical scenarios like monitoring pregnancy with fetal growth restriction, suspected fetal head growth abnormalities, and labor outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.