Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35928011›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Quantization Framework for Fast Spiking Neural Networks.

Chen Li, Lei Ma, Steve Furber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chen LiAdvanced Processor Technologies (APT) Group, Department of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Lei MaBeijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing, China.
Steve FurberAdvanced Processor Technologies (APT) Group, Department of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared with artificial neural networks (ANNs), spiking neural networks (SNNs) offer additional temporal dynamics with the compromise of lower information transmission rates through the use of spikes. When using an ANN-to-SNN conversion technique there is a direct link between the activation bit precision of the artificial neurons and the time required by the spiking neurons to represent the same bit precision. This implicit link suggests that techniques used to reduce the activation bit precision of ANNs, such as quantization, can help shorten the inference latency of SNNs. However, carrying ANN quantization knowledge over to SNNs is not straightforward, as there are many fundamental differences between them. Here we propose a quantization framework for fast SNNs (QFFS) to overcome these difficulties, providing a method to build SNNs with enhanced latency and reduced loss of accuracy relative to the baseline ANN model. In this framework, we promote the compatibility of ANN information quantization techniques with SNNs, and suppress "occasional noise" to minimize accuracy loss. The resulting SNNs overcome the accuracy degeneration observed previously in SNNs with a limited number of time steps and achieve an accuracy of 70.18% on ImageNet within 8 time steps. This is the first demonstration that SNNs built by ANN-to-SNN conversion can achieve a similar latency to SNNs built by direct training.

Indexed as

ANN-to-SNN conversionfast spiking neural networksinference latencyoccasional noisequantizationspiking neural networks

Identifiers

PMID35928011
PMCPMC9344889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.