Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35927975›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2024

Detection of Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia Using Noninvasive Wearable Sensors: Electrocardiograms and Accelerometry.

Darpit Dave, Kathan Vyas, Kimberly Branan, Siripoom McKay, Daniel J DeSalvo, Ricardo Gutierrez-Osuna, Gerard L Cote, Madhav Erraguntla

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diabetes Technology Meeting 2023.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Darpit DaveWm Michael Barnes '64 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Kathan VyasDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Kimberly BrananDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Siripoom McKayBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Daniel J DeSalvoBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Ricardo Gutierrez-OsunaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
Gerard L CoteDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3164-9625
Madhav ErraguntlaWm Michael Barnes '64 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0017-5866
Texas A&M University · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonitoring glucose excursions is important in diabetes management. This can be achieved using continuous glucose monitors (CGMs). However, CGMs are expensive and invasive. Thus, alternative low-cost noninvasive wearable sensors capable of predicting glycemic excursions could be a game changer to manage diabetes.

methodsIn this article, we explore two noninvasive sensor modalities, electrocardiograms (ECGs) and accelerometers, collected on five healthy participants over two weeks, to predict both hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic excursions. We extract 29 features encompassing heart rate variability features from the ECG, and time- and frequency-domain features from the accelerometer. We evaluated two machine learning approaches to predict glycemic excursions: a classification model and a regression model.

resultsThe best model for both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia detection was the regression model based on ECG and accelerometer data, yielding 76% sensitivity and specificity for hypoglycemia and 79% sensitivity and specificity for hyperglycemia. This had an improvement of 5% in sensitivity and specificity for both hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia when compared with using ECG data alone.

conclusionsElectrocardiogram is a promising alternative not only to detect hypoglycemia but also to predict hyperglycemia. Supplementing ECG data with contextual information from accelerometer data can improve glucose prediction.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusHyperglycemiaHypoglycemiaWearable Electronic DevicesAccelerometryElectrocardiographyGlucoseHumansGlucoseaccelerometer dataelectrocardiogram (ECG)hyperglycemiahypoglycemianoninvasive blood glucose monitoringquantile regressionrandom forests

Identifiers

PMID35927975
PMCPMC10973850
OpenAlexW4289877263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.