Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35927949›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2022

The epidermal bladder cell-free mutant of the salt-tolerant quinoa challenges our understanding of halophyte crop salinity tolerance.

Max William Moog, Mai Duy Luu Trinh, Anton Frisgaard Nørrevang, Amalie Kofoed Bendtsen, Cuiwei Wang, Jeppe Thulin Østerberg, Sergey Shabala, Rainer Hedrich, Toni Wendt, Michael Palmgren

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chloride transport and homeostasis in plants.Quantitative plant biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. CqHKT1 and CqSOS1 mediate genotype-dependent NaFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  9. The WD40 gene family in recretohalophyteFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Max William MoogDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2115-0123
Mai Duy Luu TrinhDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3428-3657
Anton Frisgaard NørrevangDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2044-3928
Amalie Kofoed BendtsenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3996-6529
Cuiwei WangDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3702-727X
Jeppe Thulin ØsterbergCarlsberg Research Laboratory, J.C. Jacobsens Gade 4, DK-1799, Copenhagen V, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6481-9977
Sergey ShabalaSchool of Land and Food, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas., 7001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2345-8981
Rainer HedrichJulius-von-Sachs-Institut für Biowissenschaften, Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, D-97082, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3224-1362
Toni WendtCarlsberg Research Laboratory, J.C. Jacobsens Gade 4, DK-1799, Copenhagen V, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8149-7682
Michael PalmgrenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9982-6114
University of Copenhagen · DKCarlsberg Laboratory · DKUniversity of Tasmania · AUUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Halophytes tolerate high salinity levels that would kill conventional crops. Understanding salt tolerance mechanisms will provide clues for breeding salt-tolerant plants. Many halophytes, such as quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa), are covered by a layer of epidermal bladder cells (EBCs) that are thought to mediate salt tolerance by serving as salt dumps. We isolated an epidermal bladder cell-free (ebcf) quinoa mutant that completely lacked EBCs and was mutated in REBC and REBC-like1. This mutant showed no loss of salt stress tolerance. When wild-type quinoa plants were exposed to saline soil, EBCs accumulated potassium (K

Indexed as

Chenopodium quinoaSalt-Tolerant PlantsIonsPlant BreedingPotassiumSalinitySalt ToleranceSodiumSoilUrinary BladderWaterIonsPotassiumSodiumSoilWaterabiotic stressChenopodium quinoaepidermal bladder cellsquinoasalt tolerance

Identifiers

PMID35927949
PMCPMC9804403
OpenAlexW4289889810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.