Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35927690›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2022

The value of incorporating patient-consulted medication reconciliation in influencing drug-related actions in the outpatient rheumatology setting.

Denise J van der Nat, Victor J B Huiskes, Aatke van der Maas, Judith Y M N Derijks-Engwegen, Hein A W van Onzenoort, Bart J F van den Bemt

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Denise J van der NatDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands.
Victor J B HuiskesDepartment of Pharmacy, St. Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. v.huiskes@maartenskliniek.nl.
Aatke van der MaasDepartment of Rheumatology, St. Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Judith Y M N Derijks-EngwegenDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Hein A W van OnzenoortDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences (RIHS), Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Bart J F van den BemtDepartment of Pharmacy, St. Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Sint Maartenskliniek · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnintentional changes to patients' medicine regimens and drug non-adherence are discovered by medication reconciliation. High numbers of outpatient visits and medication reconciliation being time-consuming, make it challenging to perform medication reconciliation for all outpatients. Therefore, we aimed to get insight into the proportion of outpatient visits in which information obtained with medication reconciliation led to additional drug-related actions.

methodsIn October and November 2018, we performed a cross-sectional observational study at the rheumatology outpatient clinic. Based on a standardized data collection form, outpatient visits were observed by a pharmacy technician trained to observe and report all drug-related actions made by the rheumatologist. Afterwards, the nine observed rheumatologists and an expert panel, consisting of two rheumatologists and two pharmacists, were individually asked which drug information reported on the drug list composed by medication reconciliation was required to perform the drug-related actions. The four members of the expert panel discussed until consensus was reached about their assessment of the required information. Subsequently, a researcher determined if the required information was available in digital sources: electronic medical record (electronic prescribing system plus physician's medical notes) or Dutch Nationwide Medication Record System.

resultsOf the 114 selected patients, 83 (73%) patients were included. If both digital drug sources were available, patient's input during medication reconciliation resulted in additional information to perform drug-related actions according to the rheumatologist in 0% of the visits and according to the expert panel in 14%. If there was only access to the electronic medical record, the proportions were 8 and 29%, respectively. Patient's input was especially required for starting a new drug and discussing drug-related problems.

conclusionsIf rheumatologists only had access to the electronic medical record, in 1 out of 3 visits the patient provided additional information during medication reconciliation which was required to perform a drug-related action. When rheumatologists had access to two digital sources, patient's additional input during medication reconciliation was at most 14%. As the added value of patient's input was highest when rheumatologists prescribe a new drug and/or discuss a drug-related problem, it may be considered that rheumatologists only perform medication reconciliation during the visit when performing one of these actions.

Indexed as

Medication ReconciliationRheumatologyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansOutpatientsPharmacistsDrug informationMedication reconciliationMedication safetyOutpatient clinic

Identifiers

PMID35927690
PMCPMC9354341
OpenAlexW4289816735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.