ReviewPediatric research2023
The evolving value of older biomarkers in the clinical diagnosis of pediatric sepsis.
Review in Pediatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early recognition and bundle-based management of pediatric sepsis in the emergency department: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Proteomic profiling and pathway analyses reveal molecular signatures and immune networks in pediatric sepsis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026Article
- Role of biomarkers in pediatric sepsis: What evidence says?World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Review
- Serum HMGB1 as a biomarker and predictive model for pediatric septic shock: a cohort study.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Localized surface plasmon resonance-based point-of-care testing for pediatric sepsis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Differential protein expression and enriched pathways in pediatric sepsis: identification of novel brain-associated biomarkers revealed through proteomic profiling.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis and experimental validation of BST1 as a novel diagnostic biomarker for pediatric sepsis using multiple machine learning algorithms.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Unraveling the promise and challenges of biomarkers in pediatric sepsis: a commentary on risk estimation of organ dysfunction and immune dysregulation.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Screening and Identification of Neutrophil Extracellular Trap-related Diagnostic Biomarkers for Pediatric Sepsis by Machine Learning.Inflammation · 2025Article
- Advances and Challenges in Pediatric Sepsis Diagnosis: Integrating Early Warning Scores and Biomarkers for Improved Prognosis.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Machine learning-based time-to-event survival analysis in pediatric patients with severe sepsis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Diagnostic value of procalcitonin and hemocyte parameters in neonates with bloodstream infection: Role of activated hemocyte-related genes.Pediatric discovery · 2024Article
- Crossing Age Boundaries: The Unifying Potential of Presepsin in Sepsis Diagnosis Across Diverse Age Groups.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Multilevel omics for the discovery of biomarkers in pediatric sepsis.Pediatric investigation · 2023Review
- Refining empiric subgroups of pediatric sepsis using machine-learning techniques on observational data.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Review
- Lysosome-Related Diagnostic Biomarkers for Pediatric Sepsis Integrated by Machine Learning.Journal of inflammation research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis remains the leading cause of childhood mortality worldwide. The evolving definition of pediatric sepsis is extrapolated from adult studies. Although lacking formal validation in the pediatric population, this working definition has historically proven its clinical utility. Prompt identification of pediatric sepsis is challenging as clinical picture is often variable. Timely intervention is crucial for optimal outcome, thus biomarkers are utilized to aid in immediate, yet judicious, diagnosis of sepsis. Over time, their use in sepsis has expanded with discovery of newer biomarkers that include genomic bio-signatures. Despite recent scientific advances, there is no biomarker that can accurately diagnose sepsis. Furthermore, older biomarkers are readily available in most institutions while newer biomarkers are not. Hence, the latter's clinical value in pediatric sepsis remains theoretical. Albeit promising, scarce data on newer biomarkers have been extracted from research settings making their clinical value unclear. As interest in newer biomarkers continue to proliferate despite their ambiguous clinical use, the literature on older biomarkers in clinical settings continue to diminish. Thus, revisiting the evolving value of these earliest biomarkers in optimizing pediatric sepsis diagnosis is warranted. This review focuses on the four most readily available biomarkers to bedside clinicians in diagnosing pediatric sepsis. IMPACT: The definition of pediatric sepsis remains an extrapolation from adult studies. Older biomarkers that include C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, ferritin, and lactate are the most readily available biomarkers in most pediatric institutions to aid in the diagnosis of pediatric sepsis. Older biomarkers, although in varying levels of reliability, remain to be useful clinical adjuncts in the diagnosis of pediatric sepsis if used in the appropriate clinical context. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin are more sensitive and specific among these older biomarkers in diagnosing pediatric sepsis although evidence varies in different age groups and clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35927575What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.