Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35927575›Full record

ReviewPediatric research2023

The evolving value of older biomarkers in the clinical diagnosis of pediatric sepsis.

Peter Paul C Lim, Dayle J Bondarev, Amy M Edwards, Claudia M Hoyen, Charles G Macias

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Proteomic profiling and pathway analyses reveal molecular signatures and immune networks in pediatric sepsis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  3. Role of biomarkers in pediatric sepsis: What evidence says?World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter Paul C LimDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals-Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA. jespaulz7k@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8034-3406
Dayle J BondarevDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals-Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Amy M EdwardsDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals-Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Claudia M HoyenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals-Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Charles G MaciasDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospitals-Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis remains the leading cause of childhood mortality worldwide. The evolving definition of pediatric sepsis is extrapolated from adult studies. Although lacking formal validation in the pediatric population, this working definition has historically proven its clinical utility. Prompt identification of pediatric sepsis is challenging as clinical picture is often variable. Timely intervention is crucial for optimal outcome, thus biomarkers are utilized to aid in immediate, yet judicious, diagnosis of sepsis. Over time, their use in sepsis has expanded with discovery of newer biomarkers that include genomic bio-signatures. Despite recent scientific advances, there is no biomarker that can accurately diagnose sepsis. Furthermore, older biomarkers are readily available in most institutions while newer biomarkers are not. Hence, the latter's clinical value in pediatric sepsis remains theoretical. Albeit promising, scarce data on newer biomarkers have been extracted from research settings making their clinical value unclear. As interest in newer biomarkers continue to proliferate despite their ambiguous clinical use, the literature on older biomarkers in clinical settings continue to diminish. Thus, revisiting the evolving value of these earliest biomarkers in optimizing pediatric sepsis diagnosis is warranted. This review focuses on the four most readily available biomarkers to bedside clinicians in diagnosing pediatric sepsis. IMPACT: The definition of pediatric sepsis remains an extrapolation from adult studies. Older biomarkers that include C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, ferritin, and lactate are the most readily available biomarkers in most pediatric institutions to aid in the diagnosis of pediatric sepsis. Older biomarkers, although in varying levels of reliability, remain to be useful clinical adjuncts in the diagnosis of pediatric sepsis if used in the appropriate clinical context. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin are more sensitive and specific among these older biomarkers in diagnosing pediatric sepsis although evidence varies in different age groups and clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

C-Reactive ProteinSepsisAdultBiomarkersChildHumansLactic AcidProcalcitoninReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinLactic AcidProcalcitonin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.