Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35927500›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2023

Age and Breast Reconstruction.

Luis Chang-Azancot, Pedro Abizanda, María Gijón, Nitzan Kenig, Manuel Campello, Jessica Juez, Antonio Talaya, Gregorio Gómez-Bajo, Javier Montón, Rodrigo Sánchez-Bayona

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luis Chang-AzancotPlastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain. luischangaz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2907-9085
Pedro AbizandaGeriatrics Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario of Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
María GijónPlastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain.
Nitzan KenigPlastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain.
Manuel CampelloPlastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain.
Jessica JuezPlastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain.
Antonio TalayaPlastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain.
Gregorio Gómez-BajoPlastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain.
Javier MontónPlastic Surgery Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, 02006, Albacete, Spain.
Rodrigo Sánchez-BayonaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041, Madrid, Spain.
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast reconstruction is frequently offered to cancer patients who undergo mastectomy. Older women tend to have lower rates of reconstruction mostly due to an age-based discretion. We aimed to assess the safety of this surgery in this population.

methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients who underwent breast reconstruction following mastectomy between 2015 and 2020 at "Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete." Patients were classified according to age when the reconstruction process began (group A: < 65 years-group B: > 65 years). Differences in demographics and clinical data were analyzed using Student's t test and Chi-square test. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratio (OR) and confidence intervals (CIs) for surgical complications according to age group. Propensity-score matching was used as a sensitivity analysis to test consistency among results.

resultsWe included 304 women (266: group A-38: group B). Complete reconstruction was achieved in 48.1% of patients in group A vs 10.5% in group B (P < 0.001). After adjusting for potential confounders, age was not associated with an increased risk of surgical complications, neither overall (OR 0.88, 95%CI 0.40-1.95), early (OR 1.35, 95%CI 0.58-3.13) nor late (OR 1.05, 95%CI 0.40-2.81). Radiotherapy and smoking history were significant predictors for complications in every setting.

conclusionsIn our cohort, age at breast reconstruction is not associated with a higher risk of surgical complications, in contrast to radiotherapy and smoking history. Therefore, age should not be a limiting factor when considering breast reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyAgedFemaleHumansMastectomyRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBreast reconstructionOlder womenQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID35927500
OpenAlexW4289794087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.