Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35927448›Full record

ArticleNature microbiology2022

Single mutation makes Escherichia coli an insect mutualist.

Ryuichi Koga, Minoru Moriyama, Naoko Onodera-Tanifuji, Yoshiko Ishii, Hiroki Takai, Masaki Mizutani, Kohei Oguchi, Reiko Okura, Shingo Suzuki, Yasuhiro Gotoh and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SymbioticmBio · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Insects · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Heritable symbiont producing nonribosomal peptide confers extreme heat sensitivity and antifungal protection on its host.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Ryuichi KogaBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan. r-koga@aist.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0903-0364
Minoru MoriyamaBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4369-6477
Naoko Onodera-TanifujiBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan.
Yoshiko IshiiBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan.
Hiroki TakaiBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan.
Masaki MizutaniBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7950-4866
Kohei OguchiBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan.
Reiko OkuraDepartment of Basic Science, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Shingo SuzukiCenter for Biosystem Dynamics Research, RIKEN, Osaka, Japan.
Yasuhiro GotohDepartment of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Tetsuya HayashiDepartment of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6366-7177
Masahide SekiLaboratory of Systems Genomics, Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6091-8698
Yutaka SuzukiLaboratory of Systems Genomics, Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Chiba, Japan.
Yudai NishideBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5978-3367
Takahiro HosokawaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yuichi WakamotoDepartment of Basic Science, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6233-0844
Chikara FurusawaCenter for Biosystem Dynamics Research, RIKEN, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3554-4975
Takema FukatsuBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan. t-fukatsu@aist.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5987-2602
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JPKyushu University · JPRIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPTokyo University of the Arts · JPNational Agriculture and Food Research Organization · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms often live in symbiosis with their hosts, and some are considered mutualists, where all species involved benefit from the interaction. How free-living microorganisms have evolved to become mutualists is unclear. Here we report an experimental system in which non-symbiotic Escherichia coli evolves into an insect mutualist. The stinkbug Plautia stali is typically associated with its essential gut symbiont, Pantoea sp., which colonizes a specialized symbiotic organ. When sterilized newborn nymphs were infected with E. coli rather than Pantoea sp., only a few insects survived, in which E. coli exhibited specific localization to the symbiotic organ and vertical transmission to the offspring. Through transgenerational maintenance with P. stali, several hypermutating E. coli lines independently evolved to support the host's high adult emergence and improved body colour; these were called 'mutualistic' E. coli. These mutants exhibited slower bacterial growth, smaller size, loss of flagellar motility and lack of an extracellular matrix. Transcriptomic and genomic analyses of 'mutualistic' E. coli lines revealed independent mutations that disrupted the carbon catabolite repression global transcriptional regulator system. Each mutation reproduced the mutualistic phenotypes when introduced into wild-type E. coli, confirming that single carbon catabolite repression mutations can make E. coli an insect mutualist. These findings provide an experimental system for future work on host-microbe symbioses and may explain why microbial mutualisms are omnipresent in nature.

Indexed as

HeteropteraSymbiosisAnimalsEscherichia coliInsectaMutation

Identifiers

PMID35927448
PMCPMC9352592
OpenAlexW4289783546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.