Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35927417›Full record

ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2023

Respective Involvement of the Right Cerebellar Crus I and II in Syntactic and Semantic Processing for Comprehension of Language.

Hironori Nakatani, Yuko Nakamura, Kazuo Okanoya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The cerebellar components of the human language network.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Neural evidence of switch processes during semantic and phonetic foraging in human memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hironori NakataniSchool of Information and Telecommunication Engineering, Tokai University, 2-3-23, Minato-ku, TakanawaTokyo, 108-8619, Japan. hnakatani@tsc.u-tokai.ac.jp.
Yuko NakamuraThe Center for Evolutionary Cognitive Sciences, Graduate School of Art and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 3-8-1, Meguro-ku, KomabaTokyo, 153-8902, Japan.
Kazuo OkanoyaRIKEN Center for Brain Science, 2-1, Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan.
Teikyo University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPTokai University · JP

Funding

MEXT Grand-in-Aids for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas #4903 (Co-creative Language Evolution) 17H06380MEXT Grand-in-Aids for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas #4903 (Co-creative Language Evolution) 20H05014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The right posterolateral portions of the cerebellum (crus-I/II) are involved in language processing. However, their functional role in language remains unknown. The cerebellum is hypothesized to acquire an internal model that is a functional copy of mental representations in the cerebrum and to contribute to cognitive function. In this research, based on the cerebellar internal model hypothesis, we conducted task-based and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiments to investigate the role of the cerebellum in the syntactic and semantic aspects of comprehension of sentences. In a syntactic task, participants read sentences with center-embedded hierarchical structures. The hierarchical level-dependent activity was found in the right crus-I as well as Broca's area (p < 0.05, voxel-based small volume correction (SVC)). In a semantic task, the participants read three types of sentences for investigation of sentence-level, phrase-level, and word-level semantic processing. The semantic level-dependent activity was found in the right crus-II as well as in the left anterior temporal lobe and the left angular gyrus (p < 0.05, voxel-based SVC). Moreover, the right crus-I/II showed significant activity when the cognitive load was high. Resting-state fMRI demonstrated intrinsic functional connectivity between the right crus-I/II and language-related regions in the left cerebrum (p < 0.05, voxel-based SVC). These findings suggest that the right crus-I and crus-II are involved, respectively, in the syntactic and semantic aspects of sentence processing. The cerebellum assists processing of language in the cerebrum when the cognitive load is high.

Indexed as

ComprehensionSemanticsBrain MappingCerebellumHumansLanguageMagnetic Resonance ImagingCerebellumFunctional connectivityFunctional magnetic resonance imagingsInternal modelLanguage

Identifiers

PMID35927417
OpenAlexW4289793143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.