ArticleZoological research2022
Automatic counting of retinal ganglion cells in the entire mouse retina based on improved YOLOv5.
Article in Zoological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- AxoMetric platform facilitates rapid and unbiased automated quantification of axon regeneration in tissue sections.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Automated detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis based on cloud computing.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- A Simple and Rapid Method for Simultaneous Isolation of Mouse Retina and RPE Wholemounts.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- The role of neurotrophic factors in retinal ganglion cell resiliency.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2025Review
- Optimizing retinal ganglion cell nuclear staining for automated cell counting.Experimental eye research · 2024Article
- From beasts to bytes: Revolutionizing zoological research with artificial intelligence.Zoological research · 2023Review
- Improved UAV-to-Ground Multi-Target Tracking Algorithm Based on StrongSORT.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Pan-retinal ganglion cell markers in mice, rats, and rhesus macaques.Zoological research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glaucoma is characterized by the progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), although the pathogenic mechanism remains largely unknown. To study the mechanism and assess RGC degradation, mouse models are often used to simulate human glaucoma and specific markers are used to label and quantify RGCs. However, manually counting RGCs is time-consuming and prone to distortion due to subjective bias. Furthermore, semi-automated counting methods can produce significant differences due to different parameters, thereby failing objective evaluation. Here, to improve counting accuracy and efficiency, we developed an automated algorithm based on the improved YOLOv5 model, which uses five channels instead of one, with a squeeze-and-excitation block added. The complete number of RGCs in an intact mouse retina was obtained by dividing the retina into small overlapping areas and counting, and then merging the divided areas using a non-maximum suppression algorithm. The automated quantification results showed very strong correlation (mean Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.993) with manual counting. Importantly, the model achieved an average precision of 0.981. Furthermore, the graphics processing unit (GPU) calculation time for each retina was less than 1 min. The developed software has been uploaded online as a free and convenient tool for studies using mouse models of glaucoma, which should help elucidate disease pathogenesis and potential therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.