Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35927355›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Double guidewire technique stabilization procedure for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy involving modifying the guidewire angle at the insertion site.

Yuki Fujii, Hironari Kato, Hitomi Himei, Eijiro Ueta, Taiji Ogawa, Hiroyuki Terasawa, Tatsuhiro Yamazaki, Kazuyuki Matsumoto, Shigeru Horiguchi, Koichiro Tsutsumi and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Guidewires in GI endoscopy.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuki FujiiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama-city, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan. pmug1j9r@okayama-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4231-9955
Hironari KatoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama-city, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Hitomi HimeiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama-city, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Eijiro UetaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama-city, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Taiji OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama-city, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Hiroyuki TerasawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama-city, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Tatsuhiro YamazakiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama-city, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Kazuyuki MatsumotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama-city, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Shigeru HoriguchiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama-city, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Koichiro TsutsumiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama-city, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Hiroyuki OkadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-5-1, Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama-city, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Okayama University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsEndoscopic ultrasonography-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is often performed using a single guidewire (SGW), but the efficacy of the double guidewire (DGW) technique during endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage has been reported. We evaluated the efficacy of the DGW technique for EUS-HGS, focusing on the guidewire angle at the insertion site.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients who underwent EUS-HGS between April 2012 and March 2021. We measured the guidewire angle at the insertion site using still fluoroscopic imaging. We compared the clinical outcomes of EUS-HGS with the DGW and SGW techniques. The factors associated with successful cannula insertion, need for additional fistula dilation and adverse event rate were assessed by a logistic regression multivariable analysis.

resultsThe DGW group showed higher technical (p = 0.020) and clinical success rates (p = 0.016) than the SGW group, which showed more adverse events (p = 0.017) than the DGW group. Successful cannula insertion was associated with a guidewire angle > 137° and an uneven double-lumen cannula. The DGW technique made the guidewire angle obtuse at the insertion site (p < 0.0001). A guidewire angle ≤ 137° (OR, 35.6; 95% CI, 1.70-744; p = 0.0045) and intrahepatic bile duct diameter of the puncture site ≤ 3.0 mm (OR, 14.4; 95% CI, 1.37-152; p = 0.0056) were risk factors for needing additional fistula dilation in a multivariate analysis, and additional dilation was a significant predictive factor for adverse events (OR, 8.3; 95% CI, 0.9-77; p = 0.026).

conclusionsThe DGW technique can modify the guidewire angle at the insertion site and facilitate stent deployment with few adverse events.

Indexed as

CholestasisEndosonographyCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeDrainageHumansRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, InterventionalBiliary drainageDouble guidewireEndoscopic ultrasoundEndoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomyInterventions

Identifiers

PMID35927355
OpenAlexW4289952419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.