Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35927309›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Relationships between genome-wide R-loop distribution and classes of recurrent DNA breaks in neural stem/progenitor cells.

Supawat Thongthip, Annika Carlson, Magdalena P Crossley, Bjoern Schwer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. AAV-mediated genome editing is influenced by the formation of R-loops.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. AAV-mediated genome editing is influenced by the formation of R-loops.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Supawat Thongthip *The Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Annika Carlson *The Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Magdalena P CrossleyDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Bjoern SchwerThe Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. bjoern.schwer@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · USStanford University · US

Funding

Role of DNA double-strand breaks in neural function and homeostasisR01AG064363 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SCHWER, BJOERN · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG064363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies revealed classes of recurrent DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in neural stem/progenitor cells, including transcription-associated, promoter-proximal breaks and recurrent DSB clusters in late-replicating, long neural genes that may give rise to somatic brain mosaicism. The mechanistic factors promoting these different classes of DSBs in neural stem/progenitor cells are not understood. Here, we elucidated the genome-wide landscape of RNA:DNA hybrid structures called "R-loops" in primary neural stem/progenitor cells undergoing aphidicolin-induced, mild replication stress to assess the potential contribution of R-loops to the different, recurrent classes of DNA break "hotspots". We find that R-loops in neural stem/progenitor cells undergoing mild replication stress are present primarily in early-replicating, transcribed regions and in genes with promoter GC skew that are associated with cell lineage-specific processes. Surprisingly, most long, neural genes that form recurrent DSB clusters do not show R-loop formation under conditions of mild replication stress. Our findings are consistent with a role of R-loop-associated processes in promoter-proximal DNA break formation in highly transcribed, early replicating regions but suggest that R-loops do not drive replication stress-induced, recurrent DSB cluster formation in most long, neural genes.

Indexed as

Neural Stem CellsR-Loop StructuresDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairDNA

Identifiers

PMID35927309
PMCPMC9352722
OpenAlexW4289840380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.