Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35927032›Full record

ReviewGut2022

Recent advances in clinical practice: advances in cross-sectional imaging in inflammatory bowel disease.

Jordi Rimola, Joana Torres, Shankar Kumar, Stuart A Taylor, Torsten Kucharzik

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gut, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 79 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
22.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06705972 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparing the Accuracy of Different Ultrasound -Based Scores to Assess Disease Severity in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsInflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
NCT06800326 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Concordance of MR Enterography and Ultrasound for Treatment Response Assessment in Crohn's Disease (MANTRA): a Multicentre, Non-randomised, Multiple-arm, Prospective Cohort Comparison Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2024 to 2026Enrolled155ConditionsCrohn DiseaseArmsUltrasound, MRE Scan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Diagnostic accuracy of the international bowel ultrasound segmental activity score for assessing disease activity in Crohn's disease.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. The Emerging Role of Ultrasonography in Ulcerative Colitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 6 countries.

Jordi RimolaIBD Unit, Radiology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain jrimola@clinic.cat.ORCID 0000-0002-1814-4198
Joana TorresGastroenterology Division, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2895-5821
Shankar KumarCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5945-8791
Stuart A TaylorCentre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6765-8806
Torsten KucharzikDepartment of Gastroenterology, Stadtisches Klinikum Luneburg gGmbH, Luneburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0183-4483
Centre for Sight · INHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESKlinikum Lüneburg · DEUniversity Gastroenterology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endoscopy remains the reference standard for the diagnosis and assessment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but it has several important limitations. Cross-sectional imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and intestinal ultrasound (IUS) are better tolerated and safer. Moreover, they can examine the entire bowel, even in patients with stenoses and/or severe inflammation. A variety of cross-sectional imaging activity scores strongly correlate with endoscopic measures of mucosal inflammation in the colon and terminal ileum. Unlike endoscopy, cross-sectional techniques allow complete visualisation of the small-bowel and assess for extraintestinal disease, which occurs in nearly half of patients with IBD. Extramural findings may predict outcomes better than endoscopic mucosal assessment, so cross-sectional techniques might help identify more relevant therapeutic targets. Coupled with their high sensitivity, these advantages have made MRE and IUS the primary non-invasive options for diagnosing and monitoring Crohn's disease; they are appropriate first-line investigations, and have become viable alternatives to colonoscopy. This review discusses cross-sectional imaging in IBD in current clinical practice as well as research lines that will define the future role of these techniques.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseInflammatory Bowel DiseasesColonHumansIleumInflammationMagnetic Resonance ImagingCROHN'S DISEASEGASTROINTESTINAL ULTRASOUNDINFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASEMAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING

Identifiers

PMID35927032
PMCPMC9664122
OpenAlexW4289782265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.