Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35927025›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Dynamics of Temporal Integration in the Lateral Geniculate Nucleus.

Prescott C Alexander, Henry J Alitto, Tucker G Fisher, Daniel L Rathbun, Theodore G Weyand, W Martin Usrey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Prescott C AlexanderCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
Henry J AlittoCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
Tucker G FisherCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
Daniel L RathbunCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616.
Theodore G WeyandDepartment of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112.
W Martin UsreyCenter for Neuroscience, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616 wmusrey@ucdavis.edu.
University of California, Davis · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USStanford University · US

Funding

VISION RESEARCH CORE GRANTP30EY012576 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI MARIE E BURNS · 1999 to 2026
$18.9M
Functional Properties of Neural Circuits for VisionR01EY013588 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI USREY, W MARTIN · 2001 to 2022
$7.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY012576NEI NIH HHS R01 EY013588
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Before visual information from the retina reaches primary visual cortex (V1), it is dynamically filtered by the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) of the thalamus, the first location within the visual hierarchy at which nonretinal structures can significantly influence visual processing. To explore the form and dynamics of geniculate filtering we used data from monosynpatically connected pairs of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and LGN relay cells in the cat that, under anesthetized conditions, were stimulated with binary white noise and/or drifting sine-wave gratings to train models of increasing complexity to predict which RGC spikes were relayed to cortex, what we call "relay status." In addition, we analyze and compare a smaller dataset recorded in the awake state to assess how anesthesia might influence our results. Consistent with previous work, we find that the preceding retinal interspike interval (ISI) is the primary determinate of relay status with only modest contributions from longer patterns of retinal spikes. Including the prior activity of the LGN cell further improved model predictions, primarily by indicating epochs of geniculate burst activity in recordings made under anesthesia, and by allowing the model to capture gain control-like behavior within the awake LGN. Using the same modeling framework, we further demonstrate that the form of geniculate filtering changes according to the level of activity within the early visual circuit under certain stimulus conditions. This finding suggests a candidate mechanism by which a stimulus specific form of gain control may operate within the LGN.

Indexed as

Geniculate BodiesVisual PathwaysPhotic StimulationRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsThalamuscodinggeneralized linear modelsLGNretinasynapsevision

Identifiers

PMID35927025
PMCPMC9402337
OpenAlexW4289782719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.