Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35926996›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Study protocol of a non-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the F@ce 2.0 programme: a person-centred, ICT-supported and interdisciplinary rehabilitation intervention after stroke.

Gunilla Eriksson, Malin Tistad, Marie Elf, Uno Fors, Lena von Koch, Charlotte Ytterberg, Susanne Guidetti

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04351178 (F@ce 2.0 - Implementation and Evaluation of a Model for a Person-centred, Information and Communication Technology and Team Based Rehabilitation Intervention for People Who Have Had Stroke in Sweden), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04351178 nacompletednot on this map

F@ce 2.0 - Implementation and Evaluation of a Model for a Person-centred, Information and Communication Technology and Team Based Rehabilitation Intervention for People Who Have Had Stroke in Sweden

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2021 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsStrokeArmsMobile phone supported and team based rehabilitation, Rehabilitation as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gunilla ErikssonDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5308-4821
Malin TistadDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marie ElfSchool of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7044-8896
Uno ForsDepartment of Computer and Systems Sciences (DSV), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lena von KochDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8560-3016
Charlotte YtterbergDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3704-8887
Susanne GuidettiDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden susanne.guidetti@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-6878-6394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKnowledge is missing on use of information and communication technology (ICT), for example, mobile phones/tablets in rehabilitation after stroke. F@ce 2.0 is a person-centred, interdisciplinary intervention supported by ICT. The components of F@ce 2.0 intend to increase performance in daily activities and participation in everyday life for patients with stroke and their significant others. Based on previous feasibility studies, a full-scale evaluation is planned in Sweden. The aim is to implement and evaluate F@ce 2.0, regarding performance of daily activities and participation in everyday life, in comparison with ordinary rehabilitation among persons who have had stroke and significant others. Second, to increase knowledge about how the programme leads to a potential change by studying the implementation process and mechanisms of impact. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Twelve rehabilitation teams (intervention n=7; control n=5) will recruit patients (n=160) who receive rehabilitation at home after stroke and their significant others. F@ce 2.0 is an 8-week intervention where patients, together with the team, formulate three activity goals regarding what they need and want to do in daily lives. The patients will receive short messages service (SMS) each morning reminding about goals, and in the evening to rate their performance during the day. Primary outcomes for patients: self-efficacy measured by the Self-Efficacy Scale; perceived performance in daily activities measured by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Significant others: perceived caregiver burden measured by Caregiver Burden Scale. Qualitative interviews with team members delivering, patients receiving intervention and significant others will explore experiences of F@ce 2.0. A process evaluation applying a case-study design using mixed methods will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority, Stockholm. Knowledge will be created for using ICT for rehabilitation of people after stroke in self-selected activities. Dissemination will include peer-reviewed publications, presentations at conferences, and information to stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER DETAILS: NCT04351178

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationActivities of Daily LivingCanadaCommunicationControlled Clinical Trials as TopicHumansQuality of Lifeprotocols & guidelinespublic healthquality in health carerehabilitation medicinestroketelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID35926996
PMCPMC9358950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.