Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35926993›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Are psychosocial variables, sleep characteristics or central pain processing prognostic factors for outcome following rotator cuff repair? A protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Ariane Schwank, Thomas Struyf, Filip Struyf, Paul Blazey, Michel Mertens, David Gisi, Markus Pisan, Mira Meeus

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04946149 (Psychosocial Factors, Lifestyle and Central Pain Processing as Potential Predictors of Outcome After Rehabilitation for Rotator Cuff Repair), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04946149 completednot on this map

Psychosocial Factors, Lifestyle and Central Pain Processing as Potential Predictors of Outcome After Rehabilitation for Rotator Cuff Repair: A Study Design for a Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKantonsspital Winterthur KSWRan2019 to 2022Enrolled142ConditionsRotator Cuff Tear or Rupture, Not Specified as Traumatic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ariane SchwankRehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk, Belgium ariane.schwank@student.uantwerpen.be.ORCID 0000-0002-1476-4840
Thomas StruyfDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Filip StruyfRehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Paul BlazeyCentre for Hip Health and Mobility, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Michel MertensRehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7170-3518
David GisiInstitute for Therapy and Rehabilitation, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland.
Markus PisanOrthopaedics and Traumatology, Shoulder and Elbow Unit, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mira MeeusRehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrognosis following surgical rotator cuff repair (RCR) is often established through the assessment of non-modifiable biomedical factors such as tear size. This understates the complex nature of recovery following RCR. There is a need to identify modifiable psychosocial and sleep-related variables, and to find out whether changes in central pain processing influence prognosis after RCR. This will improve our knowledge on how to optimise recovery, using a holistic rehabilitation approach. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This longitudinal study will analyse 141 participants undergoing usual care for first time RCR. Data will be collected 1-21 days preoperatively (T1), then 11-14 weeks (T2) and 12-14 months (T3) postoperatively. We will use mixed-effects linear regression to assess relationships between potential prognostic factors and our primary and secondary outcome measures-the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index; the Constant-Murley Score; the Subjective Shoulder Value; Maximal Pain (Numeric Rating Scale); and Quality of Life (European Quality of Life, 5 dimensions, 5 levels). Potential prognostic factors include: four psychosocial variables; pain catastrophising, perceived stress, injury perceptions and patients' expectations for RCR; sleep; and four factors related to central pain processing (central sensitisation inventory, temporal summation, cold hyperalgesia and pressure pain threshold). Intercorrelations will be assessed to determine the strength of relationships between all potential prognostic indicators.Our aim is to explore whether modifiable psychosocial factors, sleep-related variables and altered central pain processing are associated with outcomes pre-RCR and post-RCR and to identify them as potential prognostic factors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results of the study will be disseminated at conferences such as the European Pain Congress. One or more manuscripts will be published in a peer-reviewed SCI-ranked journal. Findings will be reported in accordance with the STROBE statement and PROGRESS framework. Ethical approval is granted by the Ethical commission of Canton of Zurich, Switzerland, No: ID_2018-02089 TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04946149.

Indexed as

Rotator CuffRotator Cuff InjuriesArthroscopyCohort StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesPainPrognosisProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSleepTreatment Outcomeneurophysiologypain managementpsychiatryrehabilitation medicineshouldersleep medicine

Identifiers

PMID35926993
PMCPMC9358941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.