SynthesisBMJ open2022
Long-term and serious harms of medical cannabis and cannabinoids for chronic pain: a systematic review of non-randomised studies.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of medical cannabis outcomes and associations with cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Cys-loop receptors on cannabinoids: All high?Frontiers in physiology · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effects of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on cognitive outcomes following acute use of cannabis for chronic pain.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- Psychological, behavioral, cognitive and social factors associated with single vs dual alcohol and cannabis use in adolescents with chronic pain.Addictive behaviors · 2026Article
- Endocannabinoid system modulation in acute, chronic, and neuropathic pain: reviewing experimental models, clinical evidence, and nanotechnology delivery.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Review
- UK Medical Cannabis Registry: A Clinical Outcomes Analysis for Migraine.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Navigating dose-effect complexities and challenges in cannabinoid therapy for aging-related neurobiological changes.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Cannabis Use in Orthopaedic Surgery: Effects on Fracture Healing, Opioid Requirements, and Clinical Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Review
- The Prospects of Palmitylethanolamide in Tumor Prevention and Treatment.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Review
- The Present and Future of Pain Management in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Medicinal cannabis: is current use clinically justified?Internal medicine journal · 2025Review
- Improvement in the Cognitive Function in Chronic Pain: Therapeutic Potential of the Endocannabinoid System.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Prevalence Rates, Perceptions of Risk, and Motivations for Nonmedical Cannabis Use in Pediatric Pain.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Treatment Agreements Do Not Change Clinicians' Permissive Attitudes of Cannabis Use Among Patients on Long-Term Opioid Therapy.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Reducing medical cannabis use risk among Veterans: A descriptive study.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- The Intersection of Rurality, Unmet Treatment Need, and Cannabis Use for Adults with Chronic Pain.Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.) · 2025Article
- Article
- Predicting therapy dropout in chronic pain management: a machine learning approach to cannabis treatment.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo establish the prevalence of long-term and serious harms of medical cannabis for chronic pain.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CENTRAL from inception to 1 April 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Non-randomised studies reporting on harms of medical cannabis or cannabinoids in adults or children living with chronic pain with ≥4 weeks of follow-up. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: A parallel guideline panel provided input on the design and interpretation of the systematic review, including selection of adverse events for consideration. Two reviewers, working independently and in duplicate, screened the search results, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We used random-effects models for all meta-analyses and the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to evaluate the certainty of evidence.
resultsWe identified 39 eligible studies that enrolled 12 143 adult patients with chronic pain. Very low certainty evidence suggests that adverse events are common (prevalence: 26.0%; 95% CI 13.2% to 41.2%) among users of medical cannabis for chronic pain, particularly any psychiatric adverse events (prevalence: 13.5%; 95% CI 2.6% to 30.6%). Very low certainty evidence, however, indicates serious adverse events, adverse events leading to discontinuation, cognitive adverse events, accidents and injuries, and dependence and withdrawal syndrome are less common and each typically occur in fewer than 1 in 20 patients. We compared studies with <24 weeks and ≥24 weeks of cannabis use and found more adverse events reported among studies with longer follow-up (test for interaction p<0.01). Palmitoylethanolamide was usually associated with few to no adverse events. We found insufficient evidence addressing the harms of medical cannabis compared with other pain management options, such as opioids.
conclusionsThere is very low certainty evidence that adverse events are common among people living with chronic pain who use medical cannabis or cannabinoids, but that few patients experience serious adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.