ArticleBMJ open2022
Efficacy and safety of different modes of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation delivery for patients with heart failure: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe prevalence of heart failure (HF) is increasing. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) reduces mortality and further improves the prognosis of patients with HF. However, the effect of different modes of CR delivery on HF remains unclear. Thus, the purpose of this study is to find out the relative efficacy and safety of different modes of CR delivery for individuals with HF using a network meta-analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials which compare different modes of exercise-based CR delivery for patients with HF. Databases including Embase, Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science will be searched up to May 2022. The primary outcomes will focus on the functional capacity and the health-related quality of life (hr-QOL). Functional capacity will be evaluated by peak oxygen consumption (mL/kg/min) and 6 min walking test (metres). The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, Short Form-36, Psychometric properties of the Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire and EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire will serve as measures of hr-QOL. As secondary outcomes, we will assess hospital admissions (all-cause and cardiac) and all-cause mortality, which required a minimum follow-up of 6 months, as well as adverse events during exercise training. The risk of bias for individual studies will be evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook. The quality of evidence will be assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study does not require ethics approval as it is based on published trials. Results of this systematic review and network meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for future publication. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021278351.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.